Will the clinicians support the researchers and teachers? Results of a salary satisfaction survey of 947 academic surgeons.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether academic surgeons are satisfied with their salaries, and if they are willing to forego some compensation to support departmental academic endeavors.

BACKGROUND

Increasing financial constraints have led many academic surgery departments to rely on increasingly on clinical revenue generation for the cross-subsidization of research and teach missions.

METHODS

Members of 3 academic surgical societies (n = 3059) were surveyed on practice characteristics and attitudes about financial compensation. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify determinants of salary satisfaction and willingness to forego compensation to support academic missions.

RESULTS

One thousand thirty-eight (33.9%) surgeons responded to our survey, 947 of whom maintain an academic practice. Of these academic surgeons, 49.7% expressed satisfaction with their compensation. Length of career, administrative responsibility for compensation and membership in the American Surgical Association or the Society of University Surgeons were predictive of salary satisfaction on univariate analysis. Frequent emergency call duty, increased clinical activity, and greater perceived difference between academic and private practice compensation were predictive of salary dissatisfaction. On multivariate analysis, increased clinical activity was inversely associated with both salary satisfaction (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 0.77; [95% CI: 0.64, 0.94]; P = 0.009) and amount of compensation willingly killed for an academic practice (AOR, 0.71; [0.61, 0.83]; P < 0.0005).

CONCLUSIONS

Increasing reliance on clinical revenue to subsidize nonclinical academic missions is disaffecting many academic surgeons. Redefined mission priorities, enhanced nonfinancial rewards, utilization of nonclinical revenue sources (eg, philanthropy, grants), increased efficiency of business practices and/or redesign of fund flows may be necessary to sustain recruitment and retention of young academic surgeons.