May Philip A, Gossage J Phillip, Kalberg Wendy O, Robinson Luther K, Buckley David, Manning Melanie, Hoyme H Eugene
Department of Sociology, The University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA.
Dev Disabil Res Rev. 2009;15(3):176-92. doi: 10.1002/ddrr.68.
Researching the epidemiology and estimating the prevalence of fetal alcohol syndrome (FAS) and other fetal alcohol spectrum disorders (FASD) for mainstream populations anywhere in the world has presented a challenge to researchers. Three major approaches have been used in the past: surveillance and record review systems, clinic-based studies, and active case ascertainment methods. The literature on each of these methods is reviewed citing the strengths, weaknesses, prevalence results, and other practical considerations for each method. Previous conclusions about the prevalence of FAS and total FASD in the United States (US) population are summarized. Active approaches which provide clinical outreach, recruitment, and diagnostic services in specific populations have been demonstrated to produce the highest prevalence estimates. We then describe and review studies utilizing in-school screening and diagnosis, a special type of active case ascertainment. Selected results from a number of in-school studies in South Africa, Italy, and the US are highlighted. The particular focus of the review is on the nature of the data produced from in-school methods and the specific prevalence rates of FAS and total FASD which have emanated from them. We conclude that FAS and other FASD are more prevalent in school populations, and therefore the general population, than previously estimated. We believe that the prevalence of FAS in typical, mixed-racial, and mixed-socioeconomic populations of the US is at least 2 to 7 per 1,000. Regarding all levels of FASD, we estimate that the current prevalence of FASD in populations of younger school children may be as high as 2-5% in the US and some Western European countries.
对世界任何地方的主流人群进行胎儿酒精综合征(FAS)及其他胎儿酒精谱系障碍(FASD)的流行病学研究并估算其患病率,一直是研究人员面临的一项挑战。过去主要采用了三种方法:监测与记录审查系统、基于诊所的研究以及主动病例确诊方法。本文回顾了关于每种方法的文献,列举了每种方法的优点、缺点、患病率结果以及其他实际考量因素。总结了此前关于美国人群中FAS和总体FASD患病率的结论。事实证明,在特定人群中提供临床外展、招募和诊断服务的主动方法能得出最高的患病率估计值。然后,我们描述并回顾了利用校内筛查与诊断(一种特殊类型的主动病例确诊方法)开展的研究。重点介绍了南非、意大利和美国一些校内研究的部分结果。本次综述特别关注校内方法所产生数据的性质以及由此得出的FAS和总体FASD的具体患病率。我们得出结论,FAS和其他FASD在学校人群乃至普通人群中的患病率比之前估计的更高。我们认为,在美国典型的、混合种族和混合社会经济背景的人群中,FAS的患病率至少为每1000人中有2至7人。关于所有程度的FASD,我们估计,在美国和一些西欧国家,低龄学童人群中FASD的当前患病率可能高达2% - 5%。