Suppr超能文献

抗逆转录病毒治疗期间的认知变化:两种不同排名系统用于衡量抗逆转录病毒药物对HIV相关神经认知障碍疗效的比较。

Changes in cognition during antiretroviral therapy: comparison of 2 different ranking systems to measure antiretroviral drug efficacy on HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders.

作者信息

Tozzi Valerio, Balestra Pietro, Salvatori Maria Flora, Vlassi Chrysoula, Liuzzi Giuseppina, Giancola Maria Letizia, Giulianelli Marinella, Narciso Pasquale, Antinori Andrea

机构信息

National Institute for Infectious Diseases Lazzaro Spallanzani, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2009 Sep 1;52(1):56-63. doi: 10.1097/qai.0b013e3181af83d6.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Although HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders should be treated with highly active antiretroviral treatment (HAART) regimens with good central nervous system (CNS) penetration, the definition of neuroactive HAART remains controversial. We compared 2 ranking systems to measure HAART neuroeffectiveness.

METHODS

Patients with (n = 93) or at risk for (n = 92) HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders underwent neuropsychological (NP) test batteries before HAART initiation and at follow-up. Changes in normatively adjusted summary NP test z scores were calculated for each subject. Two neuropenetration scores were calculated: the central nervous system penetration reference score (number of drugs in the combination among zidovudine, abacavir, stavudine, lamivudine, efavirenz, nevirapine, indinavir, and lopinavir-ritonavir) and the CNS penetration-effectiveness (CPE) score: a summary score of 1 (high: penetration: [corrected] zidovudine, abacavir, delavirdine, [corrected] nevirapine, amprenavir-ritonavir, fosamprenavir-ritonavir, [corrected] indinavir-ritonavir, and lopinavir-ritonavir), 0.5 (intermediate penetration: [corrected] stavudine, lamivudine, emtricitabine, efavirenz, amprenavir, fosamprenavir, [corrected] atazanavir-ritonavir, atazanavir, [corrected] and indinavir), and 0 (low penetration: remaining ARVs) [corrected] for each drug in the combination. Main outcome measures were changes in global NPZ scores and in summary z scores on 5 domains.

RESULTS

At regression analyses, higher CPE scores correlated with greater improvements in NPZ-4 (P = 0.0283), NPZ-8 (P = 0.0071), concentration and speed of mental processing (P = 0.0046), and mental flexibility (P = 0.0262) summary z scores. The correlation was stronger among NP-impaired patients. By contrast, higher estimates of neuroeffectiveness with the alternative system showed no correlation. No association was seen between CD4 and plasma viral load changes with both scores.

CONCLUSIONS

The CPE score represents a step forward toward the identification of a clinically useful approach to estimating HAART ability to improve cognition.

摘要

目的

尽管人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)相关神经认知障碍应采用对中枢神经系统(CNS)有良好穿透性的高效抗逆转录病毒治疗(HAART)方案进行治疗,但具有神经活性的HAART的定义仍存在争议。我们比较了两种分级系统以衡量HAART的神经有效性。

方法

患有(n = 93)或有患(n = 92)HIV相关神经认知障碍风险的患者在开始HAART之前及随访时接受了神经心理学(NP)测试组。计算了每个受试者经标准化调整后的NP测试z评分的变化。计算了两个神经穿透评分:中枢神经系统穿透参考评分(齐多夫定、阿巴卡韦、司他夫定、拉米夫定、依非韦伦、奈韦拉平、茚地那韦和洛匹那韦 - 利托那韦组合中药物的数量)和CNS穿透 - 有效性(CPE)评分:对组合中每种药物的总结评分,1分(高穿透性:[校正后]齐多夫定、阿巴卡韦、地拉韦定、[校正后]奈韦拉平、安普那韦 - 利托那韦、福沙普那韦 - 利托那韦、[校正后]茚地那韦 - 利托那韦和洛匹那韦 - 利托那韦),0.5分(中等穿透性:[校正后]司他夫定、拉米夫定、恩曲他滨、依非韦伦、安普那韦、福沙普那韦、[校正后]阿他扎那韦 - 利托那韦、阿他扎那韦、[校正后]和茚地那韦),以及0分(低穿透性:其余抗逆转录病毒药物)[校正后]。主要结局指标为整体NPZ评分及5个领域的总结z评分的变化。

结果

在回归分析中,较高的CPE评分与NPZ - 4(P = 0.0283)、NPZ - 8(P = 0.0071)、心理加工浓度和速度(P = 0.0046)以及心理灵活性(P = 0.0262)总结z评分的更大改善相关。在NP受损患者中这种相关性更强。相比之下,另一种系统对神经有效性的较高估计值未显示出相关性。两种评分与CD4及血浆病毒载量变化之间均未发现关联。

结论

CPE评分代表了在确定一种临床上有用的方法以评估HAART改善认知能力方面向前迈出的一步。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验