Alfa Institute of Biomedical Sciences (AIBS), Athens, Greece.
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2010 Aug;16(8):1230-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2009.03040.x. Epub 2009 Sep 2.
Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) as a result of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria has contributed to the revival of the use of intravenous (i.v.) colistin. However, the additional administration of inhaled colistin for VAP is controversial. We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients with microbiologically documented VAP who received i.v. colistin with or without inhaled colistin. Seventy-eight patients with VAP received i.v. plus inhaled colistin, whereas 43 patients received i.v. colistin alone. The mean +/- SD daily dosage of i.v. colistin was 7.0 +/- 2.4 and 6.4 +/- 2.3 million international units (IU), respectively (p 0.13); the average daily dosage of inhaled colistin was 2.1 +/- 0.9 million IU. The outcome of infection was cure for 62/78 (79.5%) patients who received i.v. plus inhaled colistin vs. 26/43 (60.5%) patients who received i.v. colistin alone (p 0.025); all-cause in-hospital mortality was 31/78 (39.7%) vs. 19/43 (44.2%), respectively (p 0.63); all-cause intensive care unit (ICU) mortality was 28/78 (35.9%) vs. 17/43 (39.5%), respectively (p 0.92). The use of inhaled colistin was independently associated with the cure of VAP in a multivariable analysis (OR 2.53, 95% CI 1.11-5.76). Independent predictors of mortality were a higher APACHE II score (OR 1.12, 95% CI 1.04-1.20), presence of malignancy (OR 4.11, 95% CI 1.18-14.23) and lower daily dosage of i.v. colistin (OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.68-0.96). The outcome of VAP was better in patients who received inhaled colistin with i.v. colistin than those who received i.v. colistin alone. There was no difference in all-cause in-hospital and ICU mortality between the two groups. Randomized controlled trials are needed to evaluate further the role of inhaled colistin in VAP.
呼吸机相关性肺炎(VAP)由多重耐药革兰氏阴性菌引起,这导致静脉(i.v.)多粘菌素的使用重新受到关注。然而,对于 VAP 患者,额外使用吸入性多粘菌素存在争议。我们对接受静脉注射多粘菌素联合或不联合吸入性多粘菌素治疗的微生物学确诊为 VAP 的患者进行了回顾性队列研究。78 例 VAP 患者接受静脉注射加吸入性多粘菌素治疗,43 例患者仅接受静脉注射多粘菌素治疗。静脉注射多粘菌素的平均日剂量分别为 7.0 ± 2.4 和 6.4 ± 2.3 百万国际单位(IU)(p 0.13);吸入性多粘菌素的平均日剂量为 2.1 ± 0.9 百万 IU。接受静脉注射加吸入性多粘菌素治疗的 78 例患者中,62 例(79.5%)感染痊愈,而仅接受静脉注射多粘菌素治疗的 43 例患者中,26 例(60.5%)感染痊愈(p 0.025);两组患者的总病死率分别为 31/78(39.7%)和 19/43(44.2%)(p 0.63);两组患者的 ICU 病死率分别为 28/78(35.9%)和 17/43(39.5%)(p 0.92)。多变量分析显示,使用吸入性多粘菌素与 VAP 治愈独立相关(OR 2.53,95%CI 1.11-5.76)。死亡率的独立预测因素包括:APACHE II 评分较高(OR 1.12,95%CI 1.04-1.20)、存在恶性肿瘤(OR 4.11,95%CI 1.18-14.23)和静脉注射多粘菌素的日剂量较低(OR 0.81,95%CI 0.68-0.96)。与仅接受静脉注射多粘菌素治疗的患者相比,接受静脉注射加吸入性多粘菌素治疗的患者 VAP 结局更好。两组患者的总院内和 ICU 病死率无差异。需要进行随机对照试验来进一步评估吸入性多粘菌素在 VAP 中的作用。