Department of Pesticide Regulation, California Environmental Protection Agency, Sacramento, CA 95812, USA.
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2010 Feb;56(1):38-50. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2009.08.014. Epub 2009 Sep 3.
The California Department of Pesticide Regulation (CDPR) and the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) released revised draft risk assessments for the pesticidal active ingredient, endosulfan, just 2months apart, in November 2007 and January 2008. The exposure estimates, critical to risk assessment, were calculated by each agency using dissimilar approaches in certain aspects. The scenarios for which exposures and risks were estimated also varied somewhat between the two agencies, although there were substantial overlaps that allowed specific comparisons of exposure and risk estimates. Reasons underlying major differences in estimates of exposure for field workers working in treated crops (reentry exposure) are discussed in this paper. Differences in dislodgeable foliar residue levels calculated by CDPR and USEPA, reflecting endosulfan residues encountered by field workers entering treated orchards and fields, contributed the most to discrepancies in reentry exposure estimates between the two agencies. Additionally, because of differences in legal mandates CDPR estimated exposures for members of the public exposed to endosulfan in ambient air and when swimming, whereas USEPA did not. Exposures calculated for bystanders adjacent to a pesticide application suggest a potential health concern, but estimated swimmer exposures did not.
加利福尼亚州农药监管部门(CDPR)和美国环境保护署(USEPA)仅相隔 2 个月,分别于 2007 年 11 月和 2008 年 1 月发布了修订后的拟除虫菊酯有效成分硫丹的风险评估草案。对于风险评估至关重要的暴露估计值,是由两个机构分别采用某些方面不同方法计算得出的。暴露和风险估计所依据的情景,在这两个机构之间也存在一些差异,尽管有很大的重叠,允许对暴露和风险估计进行具体比较。本文讨论了在处理作物(重新进入暴露)中工作的田间工人的暴露估计值存在重大差异的原因。CDPR 和 USEPA 计算的可洗脱叶面残留水平的差异,反映了进入处理过的果园和农田的田间工人遇到的硫丹残留,这是两个机构之间重新进入暴露估计值差异的最大原因。此外,由于法律授权的差异,CDPR 估计了接触环境空气中和游泳时的公众接触硫丹的暴露,而 USEPA 则没有。对在农药施药附近的旁观者的暴露计算表明存在潜在的健康问题,但估计的游泳者暴露则没有。