Suppr超能文献

硫丹的人类健康风险评估。第四部分:职业重返和公众非饮食暴露及风险。

Human health risk assessment of endosulfan. Part IV: Occupational reentry and public non-dietary exposure and risk.

机构信息

Department of Pesticide Regulation, California Environmental Protection Agency, Sacramento, CA 95812, USA.

出版信息

Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2010 Feb;56(1):38-50. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2009.08.014. Epub 2009 Sep 3.

Abstract

The California Department of Pesticide Regulation (CDPR) and the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) released revised draft risk assessments for the pesticidal active ingredient, endosulfan, just 2months apart, in November 2007 and January 2008. The exposure estimates, critical to risk assessment, were calculated by each agency using dissimilar approaches in certain aspects. The scenarios for which exposures and risks were estimated also varied somewhat between the two agencies, although there were substantial overlaps that allowed specific comparisons of exposure and risk estimates. Reasons underlying major differences in estimates of exposure for field workers working in treated crops (reentry exposure) are discussed in this paper. Differences in dislodgeable foliar residue levels calculated by CDPR and USEPA, reflecting endosulfan residues encountered by field workers entering treated orchards and fields, contributed the most to discrepancies in reentry exposure estimates between the two agencies. Additionally, because of differences in legal mandates CDPR estimated exposures for members of the public exposed to endosulfan in ambient air and when swimming, whereas USEPA did not. Exposures calculated for bystanders adjacent to a pesticide application suggest a potential health concern, but estimated swimmer exposures did not.

摘要

加利福尼亚州农药监管部门(CDPR)和美国环境保护署(USEPA)仅相隔 2 个月,分别于 2007 年 11 月和 2008 年 1 月发布了修订后的拟除虫菊酯有效成分硫丹的风险评估草案。对于风险评估至关重要的暴露估计值,是由两个机构分别采用某些方面不同方法计算得出的。暴露和风险估计所依据的情景,在这两个机构之间也存在一些差异,尽管有很大的重叠,允许对暴露和风险估计进行具体比较。本文讨论了在处理作物(重新进入暴露)中工作的田间工人的暴露估计值存在重大差异的原因。CDPR 和 USEPA 计算的可洗脱叶面残留水平的差异,反映了进入处理过的果园和农田的田间工人遇到的硫丹残留,这是两个机构之间重新进入暴露估计值差异的最大原因。此外,由于法律授权的差异,CDPR 估计了接触环境空气中和游泳时的公众接触硫丹的暴露,而 USEPA 则没有。对在农药施药附近的旁观者的暴露计算表明存在潜在的健康问题,但估计的游泳者暴露则没有。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验