Suppr超能文献

在一般牙科诊所中使用树脂基窝沟封闭剂的长期性能。

Long-term performance of resin based fissure sealants placed in a general dental practice.

机构信息

Department of Preventive and Restorative Dentistry, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, NL-6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Dent. 2010 Jan;38(1):23-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2009.08.008.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the present retrospective study was to evaluate the long-term performance of resin based fissure sealants applied in a general dental practice.

METHODS

Regularly attending patients visiting the practice between July 2006 until November 2007 and who had received sealants before 1st of January 2000 were included in the study. Date of placement of a sealant in posterior non-discoloured permanent teeth and replacement by a restoration was recorded. In a clinical examination occlusal surfaces were scored for (partial) sealant loss and fissure discolouration. The restoration profile of the patient was assessed as low or high, based on the number of restorations placed per year since the first sealant. Sealants had been applied by four dentists and a dental hygienist.

RESULTS

1204 sealants were placed in 148 patients. After a mean follow-up time of 11.6 years, 41.3% of placed sealants were still fully retained and 11.4% were replaced by a restoration. Failure rates were significantly higher in high than in low restoration profile patients and in molars compared to premolars. In those fissures with lost or partially lost sealants, discolouration frequently occurred (40% of all surfaces) irrespective of restoration profile of the patient.

CONCLUSIONS

In this retrospective practice based study, long-term performance of sealants depended on restoration profile of the individual patient and the tooth type (molar versus premolar).

摘要

目的

本回顾性研究的目的是评估在一般牙科诊所中应用的树脂基窝沟封闭剂的长期性能。

方法

本研究纳入了 2006 年 7 月至 2007 年 11 月期间定期就诊且于 2000 年 1 月 1 日前接受过窝沟封闭剂治疗的患者。记录了在后续临床检查中后牙非着色恒磨牙窝沟封闭剂的放置日期和修复体替换情况。对窝沟封闭剂的(部分)脱落和窝沟变色情况进行了记录。根据每位患者每年接受修复体治疗的数量,将患者的修复体状况分为低或高。窝沟封闭剂由四位牙医和一位口腔卫生员进行了放置。

结果

在 148 名患者中,共放置了 1204 个窝沟封闭剂。经过平均 11.6 年的随访,41.3%的窝沟封闭剂仍完全保留,11.4%的窝沟封闭剂被修复体替换。在高修复体状况和磨牙中,失败率显著高于低修复体状况和前磨牙。在那些窝沟封闭剂已经丢失或部分丢失的窝沟中,无论患者的修复体状况如何,变色都经常发生(所有表面的 40%)。

结论

在这项基于实践的回顾性研究中,窝沟封闭剂的长期性能取决于患者的个体修复体状况和牙齿类型(磨牙与前磨牙)。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验