Suppr超能文献

预测心理老年患者的死亡率:一个简单的预后虚弱风险评分。

Predicting mortality of psychogeriatric patients: a simple prognostic frailty risk score.

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Maastricht, 6202AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Postgrad Med J. 2009 Sep;85(1007):464-9. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.2008.073353.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Frailty and mortality in psychogeriatric patients are hard to predict but important in counselling and therapeutic decision making. We have therefore developed a simple frailty risk score to predict mortality this population.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective observational study including 401 community dwelling psychogeriatric patients (249 women; mean (SD) age 78.0 (6.5) years), who had been referred to a multidisciplinary diagnostic observation centre. We used Cox proportional hazards regression models to identify and select baseline characteristics for the development and validation of a risk score for the prediction of 3 year mortality.

RESULTS

A total of 116 subjects died during follow-up (median follow-up duration of 26 months). Baseline characteristics associated with mortality were: age (hazard ratio (HR) 1.44, 95% confidence interval (CI)1.02 to 2.04), male sex (HR 2.93, 95% CI 1.89 to 4.59), living alone (HR 1.53, 95% CI 0.99 to 2.38), body mass index (BMI) <18.5 kg/m(2) (HR 4.09, 95% CI 2.06 to 8.14), cardiovascular disease (HR 1.42, 95% CI 0.94 to 2.15), elderly mobility score <20 (HR 1.92, 95% CI 1.24 to 2.98), number of medicines > or =2 (HR 2.28, 95% CI 1.21 to 4.31), and impaired motor (HR 1.47, 95% CI 0.93 to 2.32) and process skills (HR 1.92, 95% CI 1.12 to 2.98) in activities of daily living. These predictors were translated into an easy-to-use frailty risk score and patients were stratified into very good (<45 points), good (45-50) moderate (51-55), poor (56-61) and very poor (>61) prognosis groups. Three year mortality rates across these groups were 8.0%, 15.9%, 25.9%, 41.5%, and 68.8%, respectively (p<0.001). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of the risk score was 0.78 (95% CI 0.73 to 0.82), indicating good discriminative performance.

CONCLUSIONS

We developed and validated a risk score for the prediction of 3 year mortality. This risk score can be used to stratify patients into different risk categories, thereby informing patient counselling and tailored diagnostic and therapeutic decisions in clinical practice.

摘要

背景与目的

在老年精神病患者中,衰弱和死亡率难以预测,但在咨询和治疗决策中很重要。因此,我们开发了一种简单的衰弱风险评分来预测该人群的死亡率。

研究设计

前瞻性观察性研究纳入了 401 名居住在社区的老年精神病患者(249 名女性;平均(SD)年龄 78.0(6.5)岁),他们被转诊到多学科诊断观察中心。我们使用 Cox 比例风险回归模型来确定和选择基线特征,以开发和验证预测 3 年死亡率的风险评分。

结果

在随访期间,共有 116 名患者死亡(中位随访时间为 26 个月)。与死亡率相关的基线特征包括:年龄(风险比(HR)1.44,95%置信区间(CI)1.02 至 2.04)、男性(HR 2.93,95%CI 1.89 至 4.59)、独居(HR 1.53,95%CI 0.99 至 2.38)、体质指数(BMI)<18.5kg/m²(HR 4.09,95%CI 2.06 至 8.14)、心血管疾病(HR 1.42,95%CI 0.94 至 2.15)、老年移动评分<20(HR 1.92,95%CI 1.24 至 2.98)、药物数量>或=2(HR 2.28,95%CI 1.21 至 4.31)和运动(HR 1.47,95%CI 0.93 至 2.32)和日常活动中的过程技能(HR 1.92,95%CI 1.12 至 2.98)受损。这些预测因素被转化为一种易于使用的衰弱风险评分,并将患者分为预后非常好(<45 分)、良好(45-50 分)、中度(51-55 分)、较差(56-61 分)和非常差(>61 分)预后组。这些组别的 3 年死亡率分别为 8.0%、15.9%、25.9%、41.5%和 68.8%(p<0.001)。风险评分的受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)为 0.78(95%CI 0.73 至 0.82),表明具有良好的判别性能。

结论

我们开发并验证了一种用于预测 3 年死亡率的风险评分。该风险评分可用于对患者进行分层,分为不同的风险类别,从而为临床实践中的患者咨询和量身定制的诊断和治疗决策提供信息。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验