Int J Cardiol. 2011 Jul 1;150(1):e25-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2009.08.032. Epub 2009 Sep 6.
A 73-year-old woman suffering from anterior thoracic pain on exertion presented to our hospital. We performed coronary angiography and noted three stenotic legions in each coronary artery. For each angiographic finding, we implanted a bare metal stent (BMS), sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) and paclitaxel-eluting stent (PES) into the right coronary artery, left anterior descending and left circumflex coronary arteries, respectively. Nine months later, she died of lung disease, and we could compare the histopathological findings among the three coronary stents. In the drug-eluting stents, very thin intima, infiltration of inflammatory cells, and fibrin deposition were observed, while thick intima and no inflammatory findings were observed in the BMS. Fibrin deposition was more marked in the PES than in the SES. This report shows marked differences in the subsequent pathological course among three stents in the same patient.
一位 73 岁女性因劳力性前胸疼痛就诊于我院。我们进行了冠状动脉造影,发现每支冠状动脉均有 3 处狭窄病变。针对每一处造影发现,我们分别在右冠状动脉、左前降支和左旋支植入了裸金属支架(BMS)、西罗莫司洗脱支架(SES)和紫杉醇洗脱支架(PES)。9 个月后,她因肺部疾病去世,我们可以对 3 种冠状动脉支架的组织病理学发现进行比较。在药物洗脱支架中,观察到非常薄的内膜、炎症细胞浸润和纤维蛋白沉积,而在 BMS 中则观察到厚的内膜且无炎症发现。PES 中的纤维蛋白沉积比 SES 中更明显。本报告显示了同一患者 3 种支架在后续病理过程中的显著差异。