• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

既往经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)是否会影响冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)的临床结局?

Does prior PCI influence the clinical outcome of CABG?

作者信息

Taggart David P

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford / University of Oxford, Headington, Oxford, United Kingdom.

出版信息

EuroIntervention. 2009 May;5 Suppl D:D21-4.

PMID:19736065
Abstract

Many patients who undergo PCI subsequently undergo CABG. Until recently, however, there has been little data in the literature describing the effect of previous PCI on subsequent CABG outcome in terms of mortality or major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). There are, for obvious reasons, no randomised trials addressing this question. This article summaries the limited observational evidence which does exist and which consistently reports an increase in hospital mortality and MACE in patients with prior PCI.

摘要

许多接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的患者随后会接受冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)。然而,直到最近,文献中几乎没有数据描述既往PCI对随后CABG在死亡率或主要不良心血管事件(MACE)方面结局的影响。出于显而易见的原因,没有针对这个问题的随机试验。本文总结了确实存在的有限观察性证据,这些证据一致报告既往接受PCI的患者住院死亡率和MACE增加。

相似文献

1
Does prior PCI influence the clinical outcome of CABG?既往经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)是否会影响冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)的临床结局?
EuroIntervention. 2009 May;5 Suppl D:D21-4.
2
PCI versus CABG for multivessel coronary disease in diabetics.糖尿病患者多支冠状动脉疾病的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术对比
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 Jan 1;73(1):50-8. doi: 10.1002/ccd.21757.
3
CABG versus DES PCI in diabetics with multivessel disease: back to the BARI registry.多支血管病变糖尿病患者冠状动脉搭桥术与药物洗脱支架经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的比较:回顾BARI注册研究
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 Jan 1;73(1):59-60. doi: 10.1002/ccd.21904.
4
Renal impairment is an independent predictor of adverse events post coronary intervention in patients with and without drug-eluting stents.肾功能损害是接受冠状动脉介入治疗的患者(无论是否使用药物洗脱支架)发生不良事件的独立预测因素。
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2008 Oct-Dec;9(4):218-23. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2008.05.002.
5
Clinical characteristics and early mortality of patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting compared to percutaneous coronary intervention: insights from the Australasian Society of Cardiac and Thoracic Surgeons (ASCTS) and the Melbourne Interventional Group (MIG) Registries.与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗相比,冠状动脉旁路移植术患者的临床特征和早期死亡率:来自澳大利亚和新西兰心脏与胸外科医师协会(ASCTS)和墨尔本介入治疗组(MIG)登记处的见解。
Heart Lung Circ. 2009 Jun;18(3):184-90. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2008.10.005. Epub 2009 Mar 5.
6
Meditations on secondary revascularisation in the aftermath of the SYNTAX trial.
EuroIntervention. 2009 May;5 Suppl D:D14-20.
7
The SYNTAX score in practice: an aid for patient selection for complex PCI.SYNTAX评分在实践中的应用:辅助复杂经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者的选择
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 Apr 1;73(5):618-9. doi: 10.1002/ccd.22043.
8
Percutaneous revascularization of the "unprotected" left main during acute myocardial infarction: "Dare to struggle! Dare to win!".急性心肌梗死期间“非保护”左主干的经皮血管重建:“敢于斗争!敢于胜利!”
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 Jan 1;73(1):22-4. doi: 10.1002/ccd.21909.
9
Acute and long-term outcome of unprotected left main coronary angioplasty compared to the anticipated surgical risk.与预期手术风险相比,非保护左主干冠状动脉血管成形术的急性和长期结果。
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2008 Oct;7(5):871-7. doi: 10.1510/icvts.2008.178632. Epub 2008 Jul 4.
10
The use of drug-eluting stents in venous coronary artery bypass grafts.药物洗脱支架在静脉冠状动脉旁路移植术中的应用。
EuroIntervention. 2009 May;5 Suppl D:D51-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Prognostic impact of prior percutaneous coronary intervention on patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting - A meta-analysis of reconstructed time-to-event data.既往经皮冠状动脉介入治疗对接受冠状动脉旁路移植术患者的预后影响——对重构的事件发生时间数据的荟萃分析
Am Heart J Plus. 2025 Sep 13;59:100606. doi: 10.1016/j.ahjo.2025.100606. eCollection 2025 Nov.