Suppr超能文献

儿科发育筛查测试(PEDS)和年龄与发育进程问卷(ASQ)可能无法识别出相同的儿童。

PEDS and ASQ developmental screening tests may not identify the same children.

作者信息

Sices Laura, Stancin Terry, Kirchner Lester, Bauchner Howard

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, Boston Medical Center/Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts 02118, USA.

出版信息

Pediatrics. 2009 Oct;124(4):e640-7. doi: 10.1542/peds.2008-2628. Epub 2009 Sep 7.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

In analyzing data from a larger study, we noticed significant disagreement between results of 2 commonly used developmental screening tools (Parents' Evaluation of Developmental Status [PEDS; parent concern questionnaire] and Ages & Stages Questionnaires [ASQ; parent report of developmental skills]) delivered to children at the same visit in primary care. The screens have favorable reported psychometric properties and can be efficient to use in practice; however, there is little comparative information about the relative performance of these tools in primary care. We sought to describe the agreement between the 2 screens in this setting.

METHODS

Parents of 60 children aged 9 to 31 months completed PEDS and ASQ screens at the same visit. Concordance (PEDS and ASQ results agree) and discordance (results differ) for the 2 screens were determined.

RESULTS

The mean age of children was 17.6 months, 77% received Medicaid, and 50% of parents had a high school education or less. Overall, 37% failed the PEDS and 27% failed the ASQ. Thirty-one children passed (52%) both screens; 9 (15%) failed both; and 20 (33%) failed 1 but not the other (13 PEDS and 7 ASQ). Agreement between the 2 screening tests was only fair, statistically no different from agreement by chance.

CONCLUSIONS

There was substantial discordance between PEDS and ASQ developmental screens. Although these are preliminary data, clinicians need to be aware that in implementing revised American Academy of Pediatrics screening guidelines, the choice of screening instrument may affect which children are likely to be identified for additional evaluation.

摘要

目的

在分析一项大型研究的数据时,我们注意到在初级保健机构同一次就诊时给儿童使用的两种常用发育筛查工具(父母发育状况评估量表[PEDS;父母关注问卷]和年龄与发育阶段问卷[ASQ;父母对发育技能的报告])的结果之间存在显著差异。这些筛查工具据报道具有良好的心理测量特性,在实践中使用效率较高;然而,关于这些工具在初级保健中的相对表现的比较信息很少。我们试图描述在这种情况下两种筛查工具之间的一致性。

方法

60名9至31个月大儿童的父母在同一次就诊时完成了PEDS和ASQ筛查。确定了两种筛查工具的一致性(PEDS和ASQ结果一致)和不一致性(结果不同)。

结果

儿童的平均年龄为17.6个月,77%的儿童接受医疗补助,50%的父母具有高中及以下学历。总体而言,37%的儿童PEDS筛查未通过,27%的儿童ASQ筛查未通过。31名儿童(52%)两种筛查均通过;9名儿童(15%)两种筛查均未通过;20名儿童(33%)有一种筛查未通过而另一种通过(13名儿童PEDS未通过而ASQ通过,7名儿童ASQ未通过而PEDS通过)。两种筛查测试之间的一致性仅为一般,在统计学上与随机一致性无差异。

结论

PEDS和ASQ发育筛查之间存在很大差异。尽管这些是初步数据,但临床医生需要意识到,在实施美国儿科学会修订的筛查指南时,筛查工具的选择可能会影响哪些儿童可能被确定需要进一步评估。

相似文献

3
Comparative Accuracy of Developmental Screening Questionnaires.发育筛查问卷的比较准确性。
JAMA Pediatr. 2020 Apr 1;174(4):366-374. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2019.6000.

引用本文的文献

7
Designing and validating the Dubai Tool for Developmental Screening (DTDS).设计并验证迪拜发育筛查工具(DTDS)。
Front Pediatr. 2022 Aug 22;10:924017. doi: 10.3389/fped.2022.924017. eCollection 2022.
10
Comparative Accuracy of Developmental Screening Questionnaires.发育筛查问卷的比较准确性。
JAMA Pediatr. 2020 Apr 1;174(4):366-374. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2019.6000.

本文引用的文献

3
Selecting developmental surveillance and screening tools.选择发育监测与筛查工具。
Pediatr Rev. 2008 Oct;29(10):e52-8. doi: 10.1542/pir.29-10-e52.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验