• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

万亿美元的地理课。

A trillion-dollar geography lesson.

机构信息

Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

出版信息

Health Aff (Millwood). 2009 Sep-Oct;28(5):1448-51. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.28.5.1448.

DOI:10.1377/hlthaff.28.5.1448
PMID:19738262
Abstract

Dartmouth researchers have demonstrated that there is tremendous geographic variation in the efficiency of health care delivery systems, fostered by perverse incentives that penalize integration, reward fragmentation, and encourage the use of technologies in the "gray areas" of medicine. This research suggests that it is possible to deliver higher-quality care at lower cost. We argue that integrated delivery systems, bundled payments, and more sophisticated comparative effectiveness analysis, rather than crude across-the-board cuts in payments, are the keys to stemming cost growth, improving value, and raising the trillion dollars needed to cover the uninsured.

摘要

达特茅斯研究人员表明,医疗服务提供系统的效率在地理上存在巨大差异,这是由扭曲的激励机制造成的,这些激励机制惩罚整合,奖励碎片化,并鼓励在医学的“灰色地带”使用技术。这项研究表明,以更低的成本提供更高质量的医疗服务是有可能的。我们认为,整合型服务提供系统、捆绑支付以及更复杂的相对效果分析,而不是一刀切地削减支付,是控制成本增长、提高价值和筹集覆盖未保险人群所需的万亿美元的关键。

相似文献

1
A trillion-dollar geography lesson.万亿美元的地理课。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2009 Sep-Oct;28(5):1448-51. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.28.5.1448.
2
Competition in health care: it takes systems to pursue quality and efficiency.医疗保健领域的竞争:需要依靠体系来追求质量和效率。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2005 Jul-Dec;Suppl Web Exclusives:W5-420-33. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.w5.420.
3
Beyond bankable dollars: establishing a business case for improving health care.超越可盈利的美元:建立改善医疗保健的商业案例。
Issue Brief (Commonw Fund). 2004 Sep(754):1-12.
4
Creating a high-value delivery system for health care.创建一个高价值的医疗保健服务体系。
Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009 Spring;21(1):35-42. doi: 10.1053/j.semtcvs.2009.03.003.
5
Maryland's approach in enhancing effectiveness and efficiency in healthcare delivery: comment on "Achieving cost control, care coordination, and quality improvement through incremental payment system reform".马里兰州提高医疗服务有效性和效率的方法:评《通过渐进式支付系统改革实现成本控制、医疗协调与质量提升》
J Ambul Care Manage. 2010 Jan-Mar;33(1):61-8; discussion 69-70. doi: 10.1097/JAC.0b013e3181c9fc7b.
6
Creating value-focused healthcare delivery systems: Part three--Core competencies.创建以价值为导向的医疗服务体系:第三部分——核心竞争力。
J Oncol Manag. 1997 Nov-Dec;6(6):16-23.
7
Achieving accountable care in Massachusetts: payment reform to drive delivery system change.在马萨诸塞州实现可问责医疗:推动医疗服务体系变革的支付改革。
Issue Brief (Mass Health Policy Forum). 2010 Nov 30(39):1-10.
8
Medicaid managed care and provider consolidation.医疗补助管理式医疗与医疗服务提供商合并
J Health Hum Serv Adm. 2000 Winter;23(3):274-305.
9
The new organization of the health care delivery system.医疗服务提供系统的新组织形式。
Baxter Health Policy Rev. 1996;2:101-48.
10
Health care cost, competition, and the quality of care in third party vision plans.第三方视力保险计划中的医疗保健成本、竞争与医疗质量
J Am Optom Assoc. 1988 Jan;59(1):21-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Standardizing Medicare payment information to support examining geographic variation in costs.规范医疗保险支付信息,以支持对成本的地理差异进行研究。
Medicare Medicaid Res Rev. 2013 Sep 10;3(3). doi: 10.5600/mmrr.003.03.a06. eCollection 2013.
2
Medical spending and the health of the elderly.医疗支出与老年人健康
Health Serv Res. 2011 Oct;46(5):1333-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2011.01276.x. Epub 2011 May 24.