Vázquez Diego P, Chacoff Natacha P, Cagnolo Luciano
Instituto Argentino de Investigaciones de las Zonas Aridas, CONICET, CC 507, 5500 Mendoza, Argentina.
Ecology. 2009 Aug;90(8):2039-46. doi: 10.1890/08-1837.1.
The structure of mutualistic networks is likely to result from the simultaneous influence of neutrality and the constraints imposed by complementarity in species phenotypes, phenologies, spatial distributions, phylogenetic relationships, and sampling artifacts. We develop a conceptual and methodological framework to evaluate the relative contributions of these potential determinants. Applying this approach to the analysis of a plant-pollinator network, we show that information on relative abundance and phenology suffices to predict several aggregate network properties (connectance, nestedness, interaction evenness, and interaction asymmetry). However, such information falls short of predicting the detailed network structure (the frequency of pairwise interactions), leaving a large amount of variation unexplained. Taken together, our results suggest that both relative species abundance and complementarity in spatiotemporal distribution contribute substantially to generate observed network patters, but that this information is by no means sufficient to predict the occurrence and frequency of pairwise interactions. Future studies could use our methodological framework to evaluate the generality of our findings in a representative sample of study systems with contrasting ecological conditions.
互利网络的结构可能是由中性以及物种表型、物候、空间分布、系统发育关系和抽样伪像中的互补性所施加的限制共同影响的结果。我们开发了一个概念和方法框架来评估这些潜在决定因素的相对贡献。将这种方法应用于植物 - 传粉者网络分析时,我们发现关于相对丰度和物候的信息足以预测几个网络总体属性(连通性、嵌套性、相互作用均匀度和相互作用不对称性)。然而,此类信息不足以预测详细的网络结构(成对相互作用的频率),仍有大量变异无法解释。综合来看,我们的结果表明相对物种丰度和时空分布中的互补性都对产生观察到的网络模式有很大贡献,但这些信息绝不足以预测成对相互作用的发生和频率。未来的研究可以使用我们的方法框架来评估我们的发现在具有不同生态条件的代表性研究系统样本中的普遍性。