• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

无牙颌或有牙颌条件下单钛种植体植入的临床效果及骨保存。

Clinical outcome and bone preservation of single TiUnite™ implants installed with flapless or flap surgery.

机构信息

Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Dental School, University Ghent Belgium.

出版信息

Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2011 Sep;13(3):175-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00200.x. Epub 2009 Sep 9.

DOI:10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00200.x
PMID:19744199
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Flapless, free-handed implant surgery offers advantages for patient comfort, but studies on long-term clinical success based on marginal bone loss are scarce.

AIM

The aim of this study was to compare single implants installed with a flap (F) or flapless (FL) surgery with respect to survival and marginal bone preservation after at least 3 years.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifty-three TiUnite™ Brånemark implants, installed in 49 patients (27 females; 22 males; mean age 53 years) were examined. Then, 25 F and 28 FL were delayed loaded; bone level from the abutment-implant level was measured on intraoral radiographs. From 44 (21 F, 23 FL), 31 (18F, 13 FL), and 36 (18 F, 18 FL) implants, radiographs were available at baseline and after 1 and 3 years of function.

RESULTS

The overall survival rate was 100% and the overall mean bone loss after an average of 38 months was 1.35 mm (SD 0.91; range 0-3.7). Both F and FL showed increasing bone loss during the first year with a higher bone loss for FL than for F sites (p < .01). Afterward, no further bone loss occurred and both groups were statistically equal (p > .7). On individual implant level, nearly 80% in both F and FL were considered a success showing bone loss between 1.5 and 1.9 mm.

CONCLUSIONS

Single implants yield an excellent prognosis with stable bone levels irrespective of the surgical technique, and free-handed flapless surgery is a viable alternative to more extensively planned guided surgery. Proper case selection and clinical experience are considered prerequisites for a predictable treatment outcome.

摘要

背景

无瓣、徒手种植手术可为患者提供舒适性优势,但基于边缘骨丧失的长期临床成功研究较为缺乏。

目的

本研究旨在比较使用瓣(F)或无瓣(FL)手术植入的单个种植体在至少 3 年后的存活率和边缘骨保存情况。

材料和方法

共检查了 49 名患者(27 名女性;22 名男性;平均年龄 53 岁)的 53 个 TiUnite™ Brånemark 种植体。然后,25 个 F 和 28 个 FL 被延迟负载;从基台-种植体水平测量口内射线照片上的骨水平。从 44 个(21 个 F,23 个 FL)、31 个(18 个 F,13 个 FL)和 36 个(18 个 F,18 个 FL)种植体中,获得了基线和 1 年和 3 年功能后的射线照片。

结果

总体存活率为 100%,平均 38 个月后总体平均骨损失为 1.35 毫米(SD 0.91;范围 0-3.7)。F 和 FL 两组在第一年都出现了骨量增加,FL 组的骨量丢失高于 F 组(p<.01)。此后,没有进一步的骨丢失,两组在统计学上相等(p>.7)。在个体种植体水平上,F 和 FL 组中近 80%的种植体被认为是成功的,其骨损失在 1.5 到 1.9 毫米之间。

结论

无论手术技术如何,单个种植体都能获得良好的预后和稳定的骨水平,徒手无瓣手术是更广泛规划的引导手术的可行替代方案。适当的病例选择和临床经验被认为是可预测治疗结果的前提条件。

相似文献

1
Clinical outcome and bone preservation of single TiUnite™ implants installed with flapless or flap surgery.无牙颌或有牙颌条件下单钛种植体植入的临床效果及骨保存。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2011 Sep;13(3):175-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00200.x. Epub 2009 Sep 9.
2
Long-term clinical outcome of single implants inserted flaplessly or conventionally.无瓣与常规方法植入单牙种植体的长期临床效果。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2018 Oct;20(5):829-837. doi: 10.1111/cid.12654. Epub 2018 Aug 15.
3
Flapless and traditional dental implant surgery: an open, retrospective comparative study.无瓣与传统牙种植手术:一项开放性回顾性对照研究。
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010 Sep;68(9):2299-306. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2010.05.031.
4
Flapless implant surgery: a 2-year follow-up study of 40 implants.无瓣种植手术:40 枚种植体 2 年随访研究。
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2013 Oct;116(4):e237-43. doi: 10.1016/j.oooo.2011.12.027. Epub 2012 Jul 20.
5
Initial Crestal Bone Loss After Implant Placement with Flapped or Flapless Surgery-A Prospective Cohort Study.翻瓣或不翻瓣手术植入种植体后的初期牙槽嵴骨吸收——一项前瞻性队列研究
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2016 Jul-Aug;31(4):876-83. doi: 10.11607/jomi.4283.
6
Short-term clinical results of Nobel Direct implants: a retrospective multicentre analysis.Nobel Direct种植体的短期临床效果:一项回顾性多中心分析
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008 Mar;19(3):219-26. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01410.x.
7
Radiographic evaluation of marginal bone levels during healing period, adjacent to parallel-screw cylinder implants inserted in the posterior zone of the jaws, placed with flapless surgery.在无瓣手术中,将平行螺杆圆柱形种植体植入下颌后区,于愈合期评估毗邻种植体的边缘骨水平。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010 Dec;21(12):1386-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.01961.x.
8
A 10-year retrospective analysis of marginal bone-level changes around implants in periodontally healthy and periodontally compromised tobacco smokers.一项对牙周健康和牙周受损的吸烟人群中种植体周围边缘骨水平变化的 10 年回顾性分析。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011 Jan;22(1):47-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.01977.x. Epub 2010 Sep 10.
9
Clinical and radiographic performance of delayed-immediate single-tooth implant placement associated with peri-implant bone defects. A 2-year prospective, controlled, randomized follow-up report.与种植体周围骨缺损相关的延迟即刻单颗牙种植的临床和影像学表现。一项为期2年的前瞻性、对照、随机随访报告。
J Clin Periodontol. 2005 May;32(5):480-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2005.00699.x.
10
A 1-year prospective clinical study of soft tissue conditions and marginal bone changes around dental implants after flapless implant surgery.一项关于无瓣种植手术后牙种植体周围软组织状况和边缘骨变化的为期1年的前瞻性临床研究。
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2011 Jan;111(1):41-6. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2010.03.037. Epub 2010 Jul 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Mechanical and thermal efficiency of a single drill system for bone-anchored hearing implants.用于骨锚式听力植入物的单钻孔系统的机械效率和热效率
PLoS One. 2025 May 30;20(5):e0311026. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0311026. eCollection 2025.
2
Comparative efficacy of flapped versus flapless dental implant procedures: A meta-analysis.带瓣与无瓣牙种植手术的比较疗效:一项荟萃分析。
Int J Health Sci (Qassim). 2024 Jul-Aug;18(4):58-69.
3
Comparative evaluation of circumferential crestal bone loss after 1 year of implant placement with flapless versus flap surgery using surgical template after immediate loading in the posterior mandibular region using cone-beam computed tomography: A randomized controlled trial.
应用锥形束 CT 评估即刻负重后在后牙区使用外科模板行无瓣与有瓣种植手术 1 年后种植体周边缘骨丧失的对比:一项随机对照试验。
J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2023 Jul-Sep;23(3):226-233. doi: 10.4103/jips.jips_129_23.
4
A short review on minimally invasive implants.微创植入物简述
Bioinformation. 2023 May 31;19(5):655-658. doi: 10.6026/97320630019655. eCollection 2023.
5
Long-Term Effect of Guided Implant Surgery on Clinical Outcomes and Peri-Implantitis of Maxillary Implants-An Observational Cohort Study.引导式种植手术对上颌种植体临床疗效和种植体周围炎的长期影响——一项观察性队列研究
J Clin Med. 2023 Jun 30;12(13):4432. doi: 10.3390/jcm12134432.
6
Incidence of Peri-Implantitis, Technical and Biological Complications of Single Implants Placed with Flap or Flapless Surgery-A 10-12-Year Case-Series.种植体周围炎的发生率、采用翻瓣或不翻瓣手术植入的单颗种植体的技术及生物学并发症——一项10至12年的病例系列研究
J Clin Med. 2023 May 25;12(11):3668. doi: 10.3390/jcm12113668.
7
Soft Tissue Management on Pontic and Implant Sites Before Implants Insertion.种植体植入前桥体和种植体部位的软组织管理
Cureus. 2022 Apr 30;14(4):e24621. doi: 10.7759/cureus.24621. eCollection 2022 Apr.
8
Does implant placement using a minimally invasive technique increase early failures among trainees at an academic center?在学术中心,使用微创技术进行种植体植入是否会增加实习生的早期失败率?
Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2023 Jun;27(2):245-250. doi: 10.1007/s10006-022-01057-y. Epub 2022 Mar 29.
9
Using the Digital Flow to Increase Efficiency in Complex Partial Rehabilitation with Dental Implants.利用数字流程提高复杂牙种植体局部修复的效率。
Case Rep Dent. 2022 Feb 9;2022:7525837. doi: 10.1155/2022/7525837. eCollection 2022.
10
Comparative evaluation of crestal bone level by flapless and flap techniques for implant placement: Systematic review and meta-analysis.无瓣与有瓣技术在种植体植入中对牙槽嵴顶骨水平影响的对比评价:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2021 Oct-Dec;21(4):328-338. doi: 10.4103/jips.jips_208_21.