Department of Rehabilitation and Physical Medicine, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Kagoshima University, Kagoshima, Japan.
Hypertens Res. 2009 Nov;32(11):1015-21. doi: 10.1038/hr.2009.143. Epub 2009 Sep 11.
The purpose of this study was to assess the relative benefits of angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) and calcium channel blockers (CCBs) on cerebral hemodynamics and rehabilitation outcome in hypertensive stroke patients. We randomly assigned 35 patients to either the olmesartan (n=18) or amlodipine (n=17) treatment groups for 8 weeks. Changes in cerebral blood flow (CBF) and cerebrovascular reserve capacity (CRC) were quantified using xenon-CT and rehabilitation parameters were also measured. Over 24 h, olmesartan and amlodipine both reduced blood pressure (BP) to similar levels (systolic BP, -16.1+/-2.7 mm Hg vs. -15.7+/-3.1; diastolic BP, -9.2+/-2.9 vs. -8.6+/-3.3 mm Hg, respectively). In olmesartan-treated patients, CBF significantly increased in the affected and unaffected hemispheres, and CRC increased significantly in the affected hemisphere. No increases in CBF and CRC were observed in amlodipine-treated patients. Patients treated with olmesartan showed effective rates of improvement in hand (30.0%), upper extremities (40.0%) and lower extremities (100.0%), measured by Brunnstrom stage; these improvements were significantly different from those in amlodipine-treated patients for the total (P<0.02) and lower extremity (P<0.05) scores. There were no significant differences in Barthel indices and Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) scores. Olmesartan, but not amlodipine, had beneficial effects on CBF, CRC and rehabilitation outcomes in hypertensive stroke patients, by a mechanism independent of BP reduction and possibly by normalizing CBF autoregulation. Our results suggest that olmesartan may improve cerebral circulation and rehabilitation in hypertensive stroke patients in whom CBF autoregulation is impaired.
本研究旨在评估血管紧张素Ⅱ受体阻滞剂(ARB)和钙通道阻滞剂(CCB)对高血压性脑卒中患者脑血流动力学和康复结局的相对益处。我们将 35 例患者随机分为奥美沙坦(n=18)或氨氯地平(n=17)治疗组,治疗 8 周。使用氙气 CT 量化脑血流(CBF)和脑血管储备能力(CRC)的变化,并测量康复参数。在 24 小时内,奥美沙坦和氨氯地平均将血压(BP)降低至相似水平(收缩压,-16.1+/-2.7mmHg 与-15.7+/-3.1mmHg;舒张压,-9.2+/-2.9mmHg 与-8.6+/-3.3mmHg)。在奥美沙坦治疗的患者中,受影响和未受影响的半球的 CBF 均显著增加,受影响半球的 CRC 也显著增加。氨氯地平治疗的患者中未观察到 CBF 和 CRC 的增加。用 Brunnstrom 分期评估,用奥美沙坦治疗的患者手部(30.0%)、上肢(40.0%)和下肢(100.0%)的有效改善率,这些改善与氨氯地平治疗的患者在总评分(P<0.02)和下肢评分(P<0.05)方面均有显著差异。Barthel 指数和简易精神状态检查(MMSE)评分无显著差异。奥美沙坦而非氨氯地平对高血压性脑卒中患者的 CBF、CRC 和康复结局具有有益作用,其作用机制独立于降压作用,可能通过使 CBF 自动调节正常化。我们的结果表明,奥美沙坦可能改善脑循环和高血压性脑卒中患者的康复,这些患者的 CBF 自动调节受损。