• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

结直肠肿瘤的内镜下黏膜下剥离术:技术难点与穿孔率

Endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal tumors: technical difficulties and rate of perforation.

作者信息

Yoshida N, Wakabayashi N, Kanemasa K, Sumida Y, Hasegawa D, Inoue K, Morimoto Y, Kashiwa A, Konishi H, Yagi N, Naito Y, Yanagisawa A, Yoshikawa T

机构信息

Department of Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto 602-8566, Japan.

出版信息

Endoscopy. 2009 Sep;41(9):758-61. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1215028. Epub 2009 Sep 10.

DOI:10.1055/s-0029-1215028
PMID:19746316
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIM

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for colorectal tumors is not generally recommended because of the technical difficulties and complications, including perforation. These aspects of ESD are thoroughly analyzed in our retrospective study.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We studied 105 colorectal tumors, from 100 patients, that were treated by ESD at the Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine or Nara City Hospital between 2005 and 2008. We analyzed tumor size, operation time, rate of en bloc resection, and complications. In addition, we thoroughly investigated the cases of perforation.

RESULTS

The average tumor size was 30.4 mm; average operation time, 102 min; and rate of en bloc resection, 88.5 %. Perforation occurred in 10.4 % of the ESD procedures. Of the 11 perforations, 8 were detected during ESD and treated by clip closure during endoscopy, while 3 were evident only on subsequent routine computed tomography (CT); these were also managed conservatively. A case of postoperative hemorrhage was also observed.

CONCLUSIONS

ESD effectively achieved a high rate of en bloc resection. However, the perforation rate was substantial; hence, improvement in the ESD method is required. The outcomes of ESD, especially for early colorectal malignancies, need to be assessed further.

摘要

背景与研究目的

由于技术难度和包括穿孔在内的并发症,一般不推荐对结直肠肿瘤进行内镜黏膜下剥离术(ESD)。我们的回顾性研究对ESD的这些方面进行了全面分析。

患者与方法

我们研究了2005年至2008年期间在京都府立医科大学或奈良市立医院接受ESD治疗的100例患者的105个结直肠肿瘤。我们分析了肿瘤大小、手术时间、整块切除率和并发症。此外,我们对穿孔病例进行了全面调查。

结果

肿瘤平均大小为30.4毫米;平均手术时间为102分钟;整块切除率为88.5%。ESD手术中穿孔发生率为10.4%。在11例穿孔中,8例在ESD过程中被发现并在内镜检查时用夹子封闭治疗,而3例仅在随后的常规计算机断层扫描(CT)中才明显;这些也采用保守治疗。还观察到1例术后出血病例。

结论

ESD有效地实现了较高的整块切除率。然而,穿孔率相当高;因此,需要改进ESD方法。ESD的结果,尤其是对早期结直肠恶性肿瘤的结果,需要进一步评估。

相似文献

1
Endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal tumors: technical difficulties and rate of perforation.结直肠肿瘤的内镜下黏膜下剥离术:技术难点与穿孔率
Endoscopy. 2009 Sep;41(9):758-61. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1215028. Epub 2009 Sep 10.
2
Endoscopic submucosal dissection for treatment of rectal carcinoid tumors.内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗直肠类癌肿瘤。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 Jul;72(1):143-9. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.01.040. Epub 2010 Apr 9.
3
Long-term outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal epithelial neoplasms.内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗结直肠上皮性肿瘤的长期疗效。
Endoscopy. 2010 Sep;42(9):723-9. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1255675. Epub 2010 Aug 30.
4
Endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer: results and degrees of technical difficulty as well as success.早期胃癌的内镜黏膜下剥离术:结果、技术难度及成功率
Endoscopy. 2006 Oct;38(10):987-90. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-944716.
5
Endoscopic submucosal dissection: a safe technique for colorectal tumors.内镜下黏膜下剥离术:一种用于结直肠肿瘤的安全技术。
Endoscopy. 2007 May;39(5):418-22. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-966427.
6
Endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal neoplasia: possibility of standardization.内镜下黏膜下剥离术治疗结直肠肿瘤:标准化的可能性
Gastrointest Endosc. 2007 Jul;66(1):100-7. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2007.02.032.
7
Advantage of endoscopic submucosal dissection compared with EMR for early gastric cancer.与内镜下黏膜切除术相比,内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗早期胃癌的优势。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2006 Dec;64(6):877-83. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2006.03.932. Epub 2006 Sep 20.
8
Endoscopic treatment of large superficial colorectal tumors: a case series of 200 endoscopic submucosal dissections (with video).大肠大的浅表肿瘤的内镜治疗:200例内镜黏膜下剥离术病例系列(附视频)
Gastrointest Endosc. 2007 Nov;66(5):966-73. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2007.02.053. Epub 2007 May 24.
9
Comparison of endoscopic submucosal dissection and endoscopic mucosal resection for large colorectal tumors.内镜黏膜下剥离术与内镜黏膜切除术治疗大肠大肿瘤的比较。
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011 Nov;23(11):1042-9. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0b013e32834aa47b.
10
Clinicopathological factors associated with clinical outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal epithelial neoplasms.与结直肠上皮性肿瘤内镜黏膜下剥离术临床结局相关的临床病理因素
Endoscopy. 2009 Aug;41(8):679-83. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1214979. Epub 2009 Aug 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Prophylactic Rectal ESD (Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection) Defect Closure and Post-ESD Clinical Outcomes: An International Multi-Center Study (with Video).预防性直肠内镜黏膜下剥离术(ESD)缺损闭合及ESD术后临床结局:一项国际多中心研究(附视频)
Dig Dis Sci. 2025 Jun 24. doi: 10.1007/s10620-025-09123-7.
2
Non-Curative Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: Current Concepts, Pitfalls and Future Perspectives.非治愈性内镜黏膜下剥离术:当前概念、陷阱与未来展望
J Clin Med. 2025 Apr 5;14(7):2488. doi: 10.3390/jcm14072488.
3
Endoscopic suturing for mucosal defect closure following endoscopic submucosal dissection: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
内镜黏膜下剥离术后黏膜缺损闭合的内镜缝合术:系统评价与荟萃分析
Endosc Int Open. 2024 Oct 10;12(10):E1150-E1159. doi: 10.1055/a-2411-8724. eCollection 2024 Oct.
4
Outcome and predictive factors for perforation in orthodontic rubber band-assisted endoscopic submucosal dissection of fibrotic colorectal lesions.正畸橡皮圈辅助内镜黏膜下剥离治疗纤维性结直肠病变穿孔的结果和预测因素。
Sci Rep. 2024 Aug 12;14(1):18648. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-67214-3.
5
Risk of Residual Neoplasia after a Local-Risk Resection of Colorectal Lesions by Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: A Multinational Study.内镜黏膜下剥离术对结直肠病变进行局部风险切除术后残留肿瘤形成的风险:一项多国研究
J Clin Med. 2023 Aug 17;12(16):5356. doi: 10.3390/jcm12165356.
6
Comparison of Needle Knife versus Scissors Forceps for Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: A Prospective Randomized Study.针刀与剪刀式活检钳用于大肠内镜黏膜下剥离术的比较:一项前瞻性随机研究
J Clin Med. 2023 Mar 16;12(6):2329. doi: 10.3390/jcm12062329.
7
Left colonic localization, non-granular morphology, and pit pattern independently predict submucosal fibrosis of naïve colorectal neoplasms before endoscopic submucosal dissection.左半结肠定位、非颗粒状形态及腺管开口类型可独立预测内镜下黏膜下剥离术前初发结直肠肿瘤的黏膜下纤维化情况。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Apr;37(4):3037-3045. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09828-0. Epub 2022 Dec 21.
8
Risk Stratification of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection in Colon Tumors.结肠肿瘤内镜下黏膜下剥离术的风险分层
J Clin Med. 2022 Mar 12;11(6):1560. doi: 10.3390/jcm11061560.
9
A Steep Early Learning Curve for Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection in the Live Porcine Model.在活体猪模型中进行内镜黏膜下剥离术的陡峭学习曲线。
Dig Dis. 2022;40(6):816-825. doi: 10.1159/000521429. Epub 2021 Dec 14.
10
Use of an endoscopic flexible grasper as a traction tool for excision of polyps: preclinical trial.使用内镜弹性抓钳作为息肉切除的牵引工具:临床前试验。
Sci Rep. 2021 Sep 21;11(1):18674. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-98162-x.