Suppr超能文献

DP1拮抗剂拉罗匹坦在哮喘和变应性鼻炎中的临床研究。

Clinical studies of the DP1 antagonist laropiprant in asthma and allergic rhinitis.

作者信息

Philip George, van Adelsberg Janet, Loeys Thomas, Liu Nancy, Wong Peggy, Lai Eseng, Dass S Balachandra, Reiss Theodore F

机构信息

Merck Research Laboratories, Rahway, NJ, USA.

出版信息

J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2009 Nov;124(5):942-8.e1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2009.07.006. Epub 2009 Sep 12.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Prostaglandin D(2) is a proinflammatory mediator believed to be important in asthma and allergic rhinitis (AR). Allelic variants in the prostaglandin D(2) receptor type 1 (DP1) gene (PTGDR) have been suggested to be associated with asthma susceptibility.

OBJECTIVES

We sought to investigate the efficacy of the DP1 antagonist laropiprant (alone or with montelukast) in asthma and seasonal AR and explore whether sequence variations in PTGDR are associated with asthma severity.

METHODS

For asthma, in a double-blind crossover study, 100 patients with persistent asthma were randomized to placebo or laropiprant, 300 mg/d for 3 weeks, followed by addition of montelukast, 10 mg/d for 2 weeks. PTGDR promoter haplotypes were categorized as high, medium, or low transcriptional efficiency. The primary efficacy end point was FEV(1). For AR, in a double-blind parallel-group study, 767 patients sensitized to a regionally prevalent fall allergen with symptomatic fall rhinitis were allocated to laropiprant, 25 mg/d or 100 mg/d; cetirizine, 10mg/d; or placebo for 2 weeks. The primary end point was the Daytime Nasal Symptoms Score.

RESULTS

For asthma, no significant differences in FEV(1) or asthma symptoms were noted for laropiprant versus placebo or laropiprant plus montelukast vs montelukast (differences between montelukast and placebo: P <or= .001). No clear association was seen between haplotype pair (ie, diplotype) and asthma severity. For AR, although cetirizine (vs placebo) demonstrated an improvement in the Daytime Nasal Symptoms Score (P < .001), laropiprant did not.

CONCLUSION

Laropiprant did not demonstrate efficacy in asthmatic patients or patients with AR. Variations in PTGDR did not appear related to baseline asthma severity or treatment response (NCT00533208; NCT00783601).

摘要

背景

前列腺素D2是一种促炎介质,被认为在哮喘和变应性鼻炎(AR)中起重要作用。前列腺素D2受体1型(DP1)基因(PTGDR)的等位基因变异已被认为与哮喘易感性相关。

目的

我们试图研究DP1拮抗剂拉罗匹坦(单独或与孟鲁司特联合使用)在哮喘和季节性AR中的疗效,并探讨PTGDR的序列变异是否与哮喘严重程度相关。

方法

对于哮喘,在一项双盲交叉研究中,100例持续性哮喘患者被随机分为安慰剂组或拉罗匹坦组,拉罗匹坦剂量为300mg/d,持续3周,随后加用孟鲁司特,剂量为10mg/d,持续2周。PTGDR启动子单倍型被分类为高、中或低转录效率。主要疗效终点是第1秒用力呼气容积(FEV1)。对于AR,在一项双盲平行组研究中,767例对当地秋季常见过敏原敏感且有秋季症状性鼻炎的患者被分配接受拉罗匹坦治疗,剂量为25mg/d或100mg/d;西替利嗪,剂量为10mg/d;或安慰剂,持续2周。主要终点是日间鼻部症状评分。

结果

对于哮喘,拉罗匹坦与安慰剂相比,或拉罗匹坦加孟鲁司特与孟鲁司特相比,FEV1或哮喘症状均无显著差异(孟鲁司特与安慰剂之间的差异:P≤0.001)。单倍型对(即双倍型)与哮喘严重程度之间未发现明确关联。对于AR,虽然西替利嗪(与安慰剂相比)在日间鼻部症状评分方面有改善(P<0.001),但拉罗匹坦没有。

结论

拉罗匹坦在哮喘患者或AR患者中未显示出疗效。PTGDR的变异似乎与基线哮喘严重程度或治疗反应无关(临床试验注册号:NCT00533208;NCT00783601)。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验