Qian Ning, Freeman Ralph D
Department of Neuroscience, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
J Vis. 2009 May 27;9(5):24.1-16. doi: 10.1167/9.5.24.
Pulfrich phenomena are a class of depth illusions generated by an interocular time delay. This may be demonstrated with continuously moving stimuli, stroboscopic displays undergoing apparent motion, or dynamic noise patterns. Previous studies suggest that neurons jointly tuned to motion and disparity may be responsible for the phenomena. Model cells with such joint coding can explain all Pulfrich phenomena in a unified way (N. Qian & R. A. Andersen, 1997). However, the joint-coding idea has been challenged by recent models (J. C. Read & B. G. Cumming, 2005a, 2005c) that focus on the S shaped functions of perceived disparity in stroboscopic Pulfrich effect (M. J. Morgan, 1979). Here we demonstrate fundamental problems with the recent models in terms of causality, physiological plausibility, and definitions for joint and separate coding, and we compare the two coding schemes under physiologically plausible assumptions. We show that joint coding of disparity and either unidirectional or bidirectional motion selectivity can account for the S curves, but unidirectional selectivity is required to explain direction-depth contingency in Pulfrich effects. In contrast, separate coding can explain neither the S curves nor the direction-depth contingency. We conclude that Pulfrich phenomena are logically accounted for by joint encoding of unidirectional-motion and disparity.
普尔弗里希现象是一类由双眼时间延迟产生的深度错觉。这可以通过连续移动的刺激、经历表观运动的频闪显示或动态噪声模式来证明。先前的研究表明,共同调谐到运动和视差的神经元可能是造成这些现象的原因。具有这种联合编码的模型细胞可以以统一的方式解释所有普尔弗里希现象(N. Qian和R. A. Andersen,1997)。然而,联合编码的观点受到了近期模型(J. C. Read和B. G. Cumming,2005a,2005c)的挑战,这些模型关注频闪普尔弗里希效应(M. J. Morgan,1979)中感知视差的S形函数。在这里,我们从因果关系、生理合理性以及联合编码和单独编码的定义方面展示了近期模型存在的基本问题,并在生理上合理的假设下比较了这两种编码方案。我们表明,视差与单向或双向运动选择性的联合编码可以解释S曲线,但需要单向选择性来解释普尔弗里希效应中的方向 - 深度偶然性。相比之下,单独编码既无法解释S曲线,也无法解释方向 - 深度偶然性。我们得出结论,普尔弗里希现象在逻辑上是由单向运动和视差的联合编码来解释的。