Zwelling L A, Slovak M L, Doroshow J H, Hinds M, Chan D, Parker E, Mayes J, Sie K L, Meltzer P S, Trent J M
Department of Medical Oncology, University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston 77030.
J Natl Cancer Inst. 1990 Oct 3;82(19):1553-61. doi: 10.1093/jnci/82.19.1553.
HT1080/DR4 (DR4) is a doxorubicin-resistant human fibrosarcoma line that exhibits 150-fold cross-resistance to etoposide but does not overexpress P-glycoprotein (one mechanism of multiple drug resistance). We examined another possible mechanism that could explain resistance to both doxorubicin and etoposide: a quantitative or qualitative alteration in topoisomerase II, the putative nuclear target of these agents. The amount of immunoreactive topoisomerase II present in whole-cell lysates and nuclear extracts was three- to 10-fold lower in DR4 than in HT1080 cells. However, the topoisomerase II in nuclear extracts from both lines was sensitive to the effects of amsacrine (AMSA) and etoposide. Following treatment with AMSA, etoposide, and 5-iminodaunorubicin, topoisomerase II-mediated DNA cleavage in DR4 cells and nuclei was reduced compared with cleavage in HT1080 parent cells and nuclei. The difference between the HT1080 and DR4 lines in AMSA- and 5-iminodaunorubicin-induced cleavage was similar in cells and nuclei and could be due to the lower amount of DR4 topoisomerase II. By contrast, the difference between the HT1080 and DR4 lines in etoposide-induced DNA cleavage was much greater in cells than in nuclei. This finding suggested that cytosolic factors, removed from isolated nuclei, could influence the susceptibility of intact cells to the cytotoxic and DNA-cleaving actions of etoposide. The specific activities of several antioxidant enzymes, components of the cell's defense against free-radical damage that may be produced by doxorubicin or etoposide, were significantly different in HT1080 and DR4 cytosolic extracts. These differences may constitute an additional mechanism of resistance. Regardless, the magnitude of the resistance of DR4 to doxorubicin and etoposide cannot be explained solely on the basis of a topoisomerase II-related mechanism.
HT1080/DR4(DR4)是一种对阿霉素耐药的人纤维肉瘤细胞系,对依托泊苷表现出150倍的交叉耐药性,但不高表达P-糖蛋白(多药耐药的一种机制)。我们研究了另一种可能解释对阿霉素和依托泊苷耐药的机制:拓扑异构酶II的定量或定性改变,拓扑异构酶II是这些药物假定的核靶点。全细胞裂解物和核提取物中免疫反应性拓扑异构酶II的含量在DR4中比在HT1080细胞中低3至10倍。然而,两个细胞系核提取物中的拓扑异构酶II对安吖啶(AMSA)和依托泊苷的作用敏感。用AMSA、依托泊苷和5-去甲氧基柔红霉素处理后,与HT1080亲本细胞和细胞核中的裂解相比,DR4细胞和细胞核中拓扑异构酶II介导的DNA裂解减少。HT1080和DR4细胞系在AMSA和5-去甲氧基柔红霉素诱导的裂解方面的差异在细胞和细胞核中相似,可能是由于DR4拓扑异构酶II的量较低。相比之下,HT1080和DR4细胞系在依托泊苷诱导的DNA裂解方面的差异在细胞中比在细胞核中更大。这一发现表明,从分离的细胞核中去除的胞质因子可能影响完整细胞对依托泊苷的细胞毒性和DNA裂解作用的敏感性。几种抗氧化酶的比活性,即细胞抵御阿霉素或依托泊苷可能产生的自由基损伤的防御成分,在HT1080和DR4胞质提取物中有显著差异。这些差异可能构成另一种耐药机制。无论如何,DR4对阿霉素和依托泊苷的耐药程度不能仅基于与拓扑异构酶II相关的机制来解释。