Shah Sejal S, Ketterling Rhett P, Goetz Matthew P, Ingle James N, Reynolds Carol A, Perez Edith A, Chen Beiyun
Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
Hum Pathol. 2010 Jan;41(1):103-6. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2009.07.001. Epub 2009 Sep 16.
Accurate assessment of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 is critical for the management of patients with breast cancer. We set out to study the impact of the 2007 American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guidelines on the interpretation of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 IHC results and its correlation with fluorescence in situ hybridization results. Invasive breast carcinomas with IHC HercepTest 3+ were retrieved from the archive of Mayo Clinic Rochester. The human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 slides were rereviewed, and results were recorded as percentage of invasive tumor cells with 3+, 2+, 1+, and 0 staining intensity. Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 gene amplification by fluorescence in situ hybridization was performed on all tumors with 3+ staining in 70% or less of tumor cells. Of the 141 cases studied, 12 cases showed intense membrane staining in 11% to 30% of the invasive tumor cells and would have been scored as 2+ according to the new American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guidelines. Of these 12 cases, 6 were positive for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 gene amplification by fluorescence in situ hybridization (ratio >2.2), 4 cases were negative (HER2/CEP17 ratio of < 1.8), and 2 cases were equivocal (ratio of 1.8-2.2). One human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive case showed dramatic intratumoral heterogeneity with high-level amplification (ratio of 12.2) in the IHC 3+ area and no amplification (ratio of 1.0) in the IHC 1+/2+ areas. The 2007 American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guidelines down-scored 2.8% of tumors from human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive (IHC 3+) to human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (IHC 2+ equivocal and fluorescence in situ hybridization negative) in this study. Clinical studies are needed to determine whether the updated guidelines are better at predicting response to anti-human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 therapy.
准确评估人表皮生长因子受体2对乳腺癌患者的治疗管理至关重要。我们着手研究2007年美国临床肿瘤学会/美国病理学家学会指南对人表皮生长因子受体2免疫组化结果解读的影响及其与荧光原位杂交结果的相关性。从梅奥诊所罗切斯特分院的存档中检索出免疫组化HercepTest 3+的浸润性乳腺癌。重新审查人表皮生长因子受体2玻片,并将结果记录为染色强度为3+、2+、1+和0的浸润性肿瘤细胞的百分比。对所有肿瘤细胞中3+染色比例在70%及以下的肿瘤进行荧光原位杂交检测人表皮生长因子受体2基因扩增。在141例研究病例中,有12例在11%至30%的浸润性肿瘤细胞中显示出强烈的膜染色,根据新的美国临床肿瘤学会/美国病理学家学会指南,这些病例将被评为2+。在这12例病例中,6例荧光原位杂交检测人表皮生长因子受体2基因扩增呈阳性(比值>2.2),4例为阴性(HER2/CEP17比值<1.8),2例结果不明确(比值为1.8 - 2.2)。1例人表皮生长因子受体2阳性病例显示出显著的肿瘤内异质性,在免疫组化3+区域有高水平扩增(比值为12.2),而在免疫组化1+/2+区域无扩增(比值为1.0)。在本研究中,2007年美国临床肿瘤学会/美国病理学家学会指南将2.8%的肿瘤从人表皮生长因子受体2阳性(免疫组化3+)下调为人表皮生长因子受体2阴性(免疫组化2+不明确且荧光原位杂交阴性)。需要进行临床研究以确定更新后的指南在预测抗人表皮生长因子受体2治疗反应方面是否更好。