University of California, San Francisco, 1600 Divisadero St, Rm R200, San Francisco, CA 94063, USA.
J Clin Oncol. 2010 Oct 1;28(28):4300-6. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.24.8211. Epub 2010 Aug 9.
The optimal method to assess human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status remains highly controversial. Before reporting patient HER2 results, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)/College of American Pathologists (CAP) guidelines mandate that laboratories demonstrate ≥ 95% concordance to another approved laboratory or methodology. Here, we compare central laboratory HER2 assessed by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and quantitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) using Oncotype DX in lymph node-negative, chemotherapy-untreated patients from a large Kaiser Permanente case-control study.
Breast cancer specimens from the Kaiser-Genomic Health study were examined. Central FISH assessment of HER2 amplification and polysomy 17 was conducted by PhenoPath Laboratories (ratios > 2.2, 1.8 to 2.2, and < 1.8 define HER2 positive, HER2 equivocal, and HER2 negative, respectively). HER2 expression by RT-PCR was conducted using Oncotype DX by Genomic Health (normalized expression units ≥ 11.5, 10.7 to < 11.5, and < 10.7 define HER2 positive, HER2 equivocal, and HER2 negative, respectively). Concordance analyses followed ASCO/CAP guidelines.
HER2 concordance by central FISH and central RT-PCR was 97% (95% CI, 96% to 99%). Twelve percent (67 of 568 patients) and 11% (60 of 568 patients) of patients were HER2 positive by RT-PCR and FISH, respectively. HER2-positive patients had increased odds of dying from breast cancer compared with HER2-negative patients. Polysomy 17 was demonstrated in 12.5% of all patients and 33% of FISH-positive patients. Nineteen of 20 FISH-positive patients with polysomy 17 were also RT-PCR HER2 positive. Although not statistically significantly different, HER2-positive/polysomy 17 patients tended to have the worst prognosis, followed by HER2-positive/eusomic, HER2-negative/polysomy 17, and HER2-negative/eusomic patients.
There is a high degree of concordance between central FISH and quantitative RT-PCR using Oncotype DX for HER2 status, and the assay warrants additional study in a trastuzumab-treated population.
评估人表皮生长因子受体 2(HER2)状态的最佳方法仍存在很大争议。在报告患者 HER2 结果之前,美国临床肿瘤学会(ASCO)/美国病理学家学院(CAP)指南要求实验室证明与另一个经过批准的实验室或方法的一致性≥95%。在这里,我们比较了使用 Oncotype DX 在来自大型 Kaiser Permanente 病例对照研究的淋巴结阴性、未经化疗的患者中由荧光原位杂交(FISH)和定量逆转录聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)检测的中心实验室 HER2。
对 Kaiser-Genomic Health 研究的乳腺癌标本进行了检查。通过 PhenoPath 实验室(比值>2.2、1.8 至 2.2 和<1.8 分别定义为 HER2 阳性、HER2 不确定和 HER2 阴性)对 HER2 扩增和 17 号染色体三体进行中央 FISH 评估。使用 Oncotype DX 通过 Genomic Health 进行 HER2 表达的 RT-PCR(正常化表达单位≥11.5、10.7 至<11.5 和<10.7 分别定义为 HER2 阳性、HER2 不确定和 HER2 阴性)。一致性分析遵循 ASCO/CAP 指南。
中心 FISH 和中心 RT-PCR 的 HER2 一致性为 97%(95%置信区间,96%至 99%)。12%(67/568 例患者)和 11%(60/568 例患者)的患者通过 RT-PCR 和 FISH 分别为 HER2 阳性。与 HER2 阴性患者相比,HER2 阳性患者死于乳腺癌的可能性增加。所有患者中 12.5%和 FISH 阳性患者中 33%存在 17 号染色体三体。20 例 FISH 阳性伴 17 号染色体三体的患者中有 19 例也是 RT-PCR HER2 阳性。尽管没有统计学上的显著差异,但 HER2 阳性/17 号染色体三体患者的预后最差,其次是 HER2 阳性/正常核型、HER2 阴性/17 号染色体三体和 HER2 阴性/正常核型患者。
中心 FISH 和使用 Oncotype DX 的定量 RT-PCR 之间的 HER2 状态具有高度一致性,该检测方法在曲妥珠单抗治疗人群中需要进一步研究。