• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

安抚奶嘴之争。

The pacifier debate.

机构信息

Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Argentina.

出版信息

Early Hum Dev. 2009 Oct;85(10 Suppl):S89-91. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2009.08.025. Epub 2009 Sep 17.

DOI:10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2009.08.025
PMID:19762175
Abstract

A variety of studies have indicated that pacifier use lowers the risk of SIDS. Many observational studies have demonstrated a negative association between pacifier use and breastfeeding duration. However, observational studies cannot be used to determine whether the pacifier is the real cause of breastfeeding cessation. Evidence for causation can be better supplied by randomised controlled trials (RCTs). Three RCTs have been conducted on the relationship between pacifiers and breastfeeding, but each study has limitations, implying that the evidence of not causal effect can be questionated. We have recently presented the results of a large RCT which demonstrated that in mothers who are successfully breastfeeding at 2 weeks, the recommendation to offer a pacifier does not modify the prevalence of exclusive and any breastfeeding at different ages or the duration of lactation. It is therefore important that lactation consultants and international agencies reexamine their staunch position to discourage the use of pacifiers on the basis of a supposed adverse effect on the success and duration of breastfeeding.

摘要

多项研究表明,使用安抚奶嘴可降低 SIDS 的风险。许多观察性研究表明,安抚奶嘴的使用与母乳喂养持续时间呈负相关。然而,观察性研究不能用来确定安抚奶嘴是否是母乳喂养停止的真正原因。随机对照试验 (RCT) 可以更好地提供因果关系的证据。已经进行了三项关于安抚奶嘴和母乳喂养之间关系的 RCT,但每项研究都存在局限性,这意味着非因果效应的证据可能值得质疑。我们最近公布了一项大型 RCT 的结果,该研究表明,在成功母乳喂养两周的母亲中,建议使用安抚奶嘴不会改变不同年龄时纯母乳喂养和任何形式母乳喂养的流行率,也不会改变哺乳时间。因此,哺乳顾问和国际机构应重新审视其坚决立场,不要基于安抚奶嘴对母乳喂养成功率和持续时间的所谓负面影响而劝阻使用安抚奶嘴。

相似文献

1
The pacifier debate.安抚奶嘴之争。
Early Hum Dev. 2009 Oct;85(10 Suppl):S89-91. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2009.08.025. Epub 2009 Sep 17.
2
Does the recommendation to use a pacifier influence the prevalence of breastfeeding?使用安抚奶嘴的建议会影响母乳喂养的普及率吗?
J Pediatr. 2009 Sep;155(3):350-4.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2009.03.038. Epub 2009 May 21.
3
Do pacifiers reduce the risk of sudden infant death syndrome? A meta-analysis.安抚奶嘴能降低婴儿猝死综合征的风险吗?一项荟萃分析。
Pediatrics. 2005 Nov;116(5):e716-23. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-2631. Epub 2005 Oct 10.
4
International Child Care Practices study: breastfeeding and pacifier use.国际儿童护理实践研究:母乳喂养与安抚奶嘴使用
J Hum Lact. 2005 Aug;21(3):289-95. doi: 10.1177/0890334405278489.
5
Using pacifiers: what are breastfeeding mothers doing?使用安抚奶嘴:母乳喂养的母亲们在做什么?
Breastfeed Rev. 2002 Jul;10(2):21-5.
6
Are pacifiers associated with early weaning from breastfeeding?安抚奶嘴与母乳喂养早期断奶有关吗?
Adv Neonatal Care. 2002 Oct;2(5):259-66.
7
Pacifiers and breastfeeding: a systematic review.安抚奶嘴与母乳喂养:一项系统综述
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2009 Apr;163(4):378-82. doi: 10.1001/archpediatrics.2008.578.
8
How are effective breastfeeding technique and pacifier use related to breastfeeding problems and breastfeeding duration?有效的母乳喂养技巧和安抚奶嘴的使用与母乳喂养问题及母乳喂养持续时间有何关联?
Birth. 2009 Mar;36(1):34-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2008.00293.x.
9
Effect of restricted pacifier use in breastfeeding term infants for increasing duration of breastfeeding.限制足月儿使用安抚奶嘴对延长母乳喂养时长的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Aug 30;2016(8):CD007202. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007202.pub4.
10
Should pacifiers be recommended to prevent sudden infant death syndrome?是否应该推荐使用安抚奶嘴来预防婴儿猝死综合征?
Pediatrics. 2006 May;117(5):1755-8. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-1625.

引用本文的文献

1
The who, when, and why of pacifier use.使用安抚奶嘴的时间、对象和原因。
Pediatr Res. 2024 Oct 15. doi: 10.1038/s41390-024-03540-6.
2
A new technology for pacifier weaning: a thematic analysis.一种用于安抚奶嘴戒断的新技术:一项主题分析。
Front Pediatr. 2023 May 24;11:1161886. doi: 10.3389/fped.2023.1161886. eCollection 2023.
3
Therapeutic effect of a cleft lip teat on infants with respiratory and feeding disorders: Two case reports.唇裂奶嘴对患有呼吸和喂养障碍婴儿的治疗效果:两例病例报告。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Aug;97(31):e11467. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000011467.
4
When is the use of pacifiers justifiable in the baby-friendly hospital initiative context? A clinician's guide.在爱婴医院倡议背景下,何时使用安抚奶嘴是合理的?临床医生指南。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Apr 27;17(1):130. doi: 10.1186/s12884-017-1306-8.
5
Clinicians guide for cue-based transition to oral feeding in preterm infants: An easy-to-use clinical guide.《早产儿基于线索的经口喂养过渡临床医生指南:一份易于使用的临床指南》
J Eval Clin Pract. 2018 Feb;24(1):80-88. doi: 10.1111/jep.12721. Epub 2017 Mar 2.
6
Non-nutritive sucking for increasing physiologic stability and nutrition in preterm infants.非营养性吸吮对提高早产儿生理稳定性和营养状况的作用
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Oct 4;10(10):CD001071. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001071.pub3.
7
Effects of pacifier and taste on swallowing, esophageal motility, transit, and respiratory rhythm in human neonates.安抚奶嘴和味道对人类新生儿吞咽、食管动力、转运及呼吸节律的影响。
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2016 Apr;28(4):532-42. doi: 10.1111/nmo.12748. Epub 2016 Jan 4.
8
Comparison of design, materials selection and characterization of pacifiers produced in Brazil.巴西生产的安抚奶嘴的设计、材料选择及特性比较。
Australas Med J. 2011;4(2):76-80. doi: 10.4066/AMJ.2011.529. Epub 2011 Feb 28.