Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Early Hum Dev. 2009 Oct;85(10 Suppl):S89-91. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2009.08.025. Epub 2009 Sep 17.
A variety of studies have indicated that pacifier use lowers the risk of SIDS. Many observational studies have demonstrated a negative association between pacifier use and breastfeeding duration. However, observational studies cannot be used to determine whether the pacifier is the real cause of breastfeeding cessation. Evidence for causation can be better supplied by randomised controlled trials (RCTs). Three RCTs have been conducted on the relationship between pacifiers and breastfeeding, but each study has limitations, implying that the evidence of not causal effect can be questionated. We have recently presented the results of a large RCT which demonstrated that in mothers who are successfully breastfeeding at 2 weeks, the recommendation to offer a pacifier does not modify the prevalence of exclusive and any breastfeeding at different ages or the duration of lactation. It is therefore important that lactation consultants and international agencies reexamine their staunch position to discourage the use of pacifiers on the basis of a supposed adverse effect on the success and duration of breastfeeding.
多项研究表明,使用安抚奶嘴可降低 SIDS 的风险。许多观察性研究表明,安抚奶嘴的使用与母乳喂养持续时间呈负相关。然而,观察性研究不能用来确定安抚奶嘴是否是母乳喂养停止的真正原因。随机对照试验 (RCT) 可以更好地提供因果关系的证据。已经进行了三项关于安抚奶嘴和母乳喂养之间关系的 RCT,但每项研究都存在局限性,这意味着非因果效应的证据可能值得质疑。我们最近公布了一项大型 RCT 的结果,该研究表明,在成功母乳喂养两周的母亲中,建议使用安抚奶嘴不会改变不同年龄时纯母乳喂养和任何形式母乳喂养的流行率,也不会改变哺乳时间。因此,哺乳顾问和国际机构应重新审视其坚决立场,不要基于安抚奶嘴对母乳喂养成功率和持续时间的所谓负面影响而劝阻使用安抚奶嘴。