Trowbridge Matthew J, Kent Richard
Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Virginia Health School of Medicine, Charlottesville, Virginia 22908-0699, USA.
Am J Prev Med. 2009 Oct;37(4):321-3. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.05.021.
Recent studies suggest that the relative protection offered by rear seating in motor vehicle crashes has decreased, potentially reflecting disproportionate advancements in front-seat safety technology. Safe adaptation of advanced front-seat restraint systems for the rear-seat environment will require exposure data that are currently unavailable.
This study uses national data to quantify rear-seat occupancy patterns, restraint use, and annual travel exposure in the U.S. in order to support the development of advanced crash protection systems for rear-seat motor vehicle occupants.
Data from the 2000-2006 National Automotive Sampling System Crashworthiness Data System and 2001 National Household Transportation Survey were analyzed in 2008 to quantify occupancy patterns (e.g., seat position, restraint use) and annual person-trips for rear-seat passengers in the U.S.
The overall proportion of person-trips by rear-seat occupants is relatively low (12.9%); however national at-risk exposure remains significant (approximately 39 billion annual person-trips). Annual rear-seat travel exposure is similar among children < or = 12 years and adults (18.9 vs 19.1 billion person-trips) despite the fact that children are proportionally much more likely to ride in rear positions (79.3% vs 7.4%). Restraint use among adult rear-seat occupants was also much lower than among front-seat occupants (50.4% vs 82.2%).
While rear-seat occupancy is relatively low compared with front-seat occupancy at-risk rear-seat travel by both child and adult passengers in the U.S. remains significant. Restraint use by rear-seat occupants is much lower than that among front-seat passengers, particularly among adults and older children, substantially increasing injury risk. Development of future crash protection systems for rear-seat passengers must account for these exposure patterns to ensure safe and effective integration into production vehicles.
近期研究表明,机动车碰撞事故中后排座位提供的相对保护作用有所下降,这可能反映出前排座位安全技术取得了不相称的进步。要使先进的前排约束系统安全适用于后排环境,就需要目前尚无法获得的暴露数据。
本研究利用全国性数据对美国后排座位的乘坐模式、约束系统使用情况及年度出行暴露量进行量化,以支持开发针对后排机动车乘客的先进碰撞保护系统。
2008年对2000 - 2006年全国汽车抽样系统碰撞安全性数据系统和2001年全国家庭交通调查的数据进行了分析,以量化美国后排乘客的乘坐模式(如座位位置、约束系统使用情况)及年度出行人次。
后排乘客出行人次的总体比例相对较低(12.9%);然而,全国的风险暴露量仍然很大(每年约390亿出行人次)。尽管儿童乘坐后排的比例要高得多(79.3%对7.4%),但12岁及以下儿童和成年人的年度后排出行暴露量相近(分别为189亿和191亿出行人次)。成年后排乘客的约束系统使用率也远低于前排乘客(50.4%对82.2%)。
虽然与前排乘坐情况相比,后排乘坐率相对较低,但美国儿童和成年乘客在后座的危险出行量仍然很大。后排乘客的约束系统使用率远低于前排乘客,尤其是成年人和大龄儿童,这大大增加了受伤风险。未来针对后排乘客的碰撞保护系统的开发必须考虑这些暴露模式,以确保安全有效地集成到量产车辆中。