• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

注视中心的低层次特征对扫视目标选择的贡献。

The contribution of low-level features at the centre of gaze to saccade target selection.

作者信息

Dorr Michael, Gegenfurtner Karl R, Barth Erhardt

机构信息

Institute for Neuro- and Bioinformatics, University of Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23538 Lübeck, Germany.

出版信息

Vision Res. 2009 Dec;49(24):2918-26. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2009.09.007. Epub 2009 Sep 16.

DOI:10.1016/j.visres.2009.09.007
PMID:19765602
Abstract

Does it matter what observers are looking at right now to determine where they will look next? We recorded eye movements and computed colour, local orientation, motion, and geometrical invariants on dynamic natural scenes. The distributions of differences between features at successive fixations were compared with those from random scanpaths of varying similarity to natural scanpaths. Although distributions show significant differences, these feature correlations are mainly due to spatio-temporal correlations in natural scenes and a target selection bias, e.g. towards moving objects. Our results indicate that low-level features at fixation contribute little to the choice of the next saccade target.

摘要

观察者当前注视的内容对于确定他们接下来会看向哪里有影响吗?我们记录了眼动,并计算了动态自然场景中的颜色、局部方向、运动和几何不变量。将连续注视点处特征之间的差异分布与来自与自然扫描路径相似度不同的随机扫描路径的差异分布进行比较。尽管分布显示出显著差异,但这些特征相关性主要是由于自然场景中的时空相关性和目标选择偏差,例如对移动物体的偏好。我们的结果表明,注视点处的低级特征对下一个扫视目标的选择贡献不大。

相似文献

1
The contribution of low-level features at the centre of gaze to saccade target selection.注视中心的低层次特征对扫视目标选择的贡献。
Vision Res. 2009 Dec;49(24):2918-26. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2009.09.007. Epub 2009 Sep 16.
2
Predicting visual fixations on video based on low-level visual features.基于低级视觉特征预测视频中的视觉注视点。
Vision Res. 2007 Sep;47(19):2483-98. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2007.06.015. Epub 2007 Aug 3.
3
Saliency does not account for fixations to eyes within social scenes.显著性无法解释在社交场景中对眼睛的注视。
Vision Res. 2009 Dec;49(24):2992-3000. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2009.09.014. Epub 2009 Sep 24.
4
Perceiving colour at a glimpse: the relevance of where one fixates.
Vision Res. 2007 Sep;47(19):2557-68. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2007.06.003. Epub 2007 Aug 10.
5
Turning the world around: patterns in saccade direction vary with picture orientation.改变世界视角:扫视方向模式随图片方向而变化。
Vision Res. 2008 Aug;48(17):1777-90. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2008.05.018. Epub 2008 Jul 2.
6
Object recognition during foveating eye movements.注视眼动过程中的物体识别。
Vision Res. 2009 Sep;49(18):2241-53. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2009.05.022. Epub 2009 Jun 13.
7
Impact of dynamic bottom-up features and top-down control on the visual exploration of moving real-world scenes in hemispatial neglect.动态自下而上特征和自上而下控制对视空间忽略症患者对移动真实场景视觉探索的影响。
Neuropsychologia. 2012 Aug;50(10):2415-25. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.06.012. Epub 2012 Jun 26.
8
Object-based attentional selection in scene viewing.场景观看中基于对象的注意选择。
J Vis. 2010 Jul 1;10(8):20. doi: 10.1167/10.8.20.
9
When viewing natural scenes, do abnormal colors impact on spatial or temporal parameters of eye movements?在观察自然场景时,异常颜色会影响眼球运动的空间或时间参数吗?
J Vis. 2012 Feb 3;12(2):4. doi: 10.1167/12.2.4.
10
Saccade target selection: Do distractors affect saccade accuracy?扫视目标选择:干扰因素会影响扫视准确性吗?
Vision Res. 2009 Jun;49(10):1267-74. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2008.07.005. Epub 2008 Aug 22.