Resnick Daniel K, Anderson Paul A, Kaiser Michael G, Groff Michael W, Heary Robert F, Holly Langston T, Mummaneni Praveen V, Ryken Timothy C, Choudhri Tanvir F, Vresilovic Edward J, Matz Paul G
Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
J Neurosurg Spine. 2009 Aug;11(2):245-52. doi: 10.3171/2009.2.SPINE08730.
The objective of this systematic review was to use evidence-based medicine to examine the diagnostic and therapeutic utility of intraoperative electrophysiological (EP) monitoring in the surgical treatment of cervical degenerative disease.
The National Library of Medicine and Cochrane Database were queried using MeSH headings and key words relevant to cervical spine surgery and EP monitoring. The guidelines group assembled an evidentiary table summarizing the quality of evidence (Classes I-III). The group formulated recommendations that contained the degree of strength based on the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines network. Validation was done through peer review by the Joint Guidelines Committee of the American Association of Neurological Surgeons/Congress of Neurological Surgeons.
The reliance on changes in EP monitoring as an indication to alter a surgical plan or administer steroids has not been observed to reduce the incidence of neurological injury during routine surgery for cervical spondylotic myelopathy or cervical radiculopathy (Class III). However, there is an absence of study data examining the benefit of altering a surgical plan due to EP changes.
Although the use of EP monitoring may serve as a sensitive means to diagnose potential neurological injury during anterior spinal surgery for cervical spondylotic myelopathy, the practitioner must understand that intraoperative EP worsening is not specific-it may not represent clinical worsening and its recognition does not necessarily prevent neurological injury, nor does it result in improved outcome (Class II). Intraoperative improvement in EP parameters/indices does not appear to forecast outcome with reliability (conflicting Class I data).
本系统评价的目的是运用循证医学来检验术中电生理(EP)监测在颈椎退行性疾病手术治疗中的诊断和治疗效用。
利用与颈椎手术和EP监测相关的医学主题词和关键词检索美国国立医学图书馆和考克兰数据库。指南制定小组汇总了一份证据表,总结了证据质量(I - III级)。该小组根据苏格兰校际指南网络制定了包含推荐强度的建议。通过美国神经外科医师协会/神经外科医师大会联合指南委员会的同行评审进行验证。
在颈椎病性脊髓病或神经根型颈椎病的常规手术中,未观察到依靠EP监测变化作为改变手术计划或给予类固醇的指征能降低神经损伤的发生率(III级)。然而,缺乏研究数据来检验因EP变化而改变手术计划的益处。
尽管在颈椎病性脊髓病的前路脊柱手术中,使用EP监测可能是诊断潜在神经损伤的一种敏感方法,但从业者必须明白,术中EP恶化并不具有特异性——它可能并不代表临床恶化,其识别不一定能预防神经损伤,也不会改善预后(II级)。术中EP参数/指标的改善似乎并不能可靠地预测预后(I级数据相互矛盾)。