School of Psychology and Counselling, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Br J Health Psychol. 2010 May;15(Pt 2):435-52. doi: 10.1348/135910709X468232. Epub 2009 Sep 18.
To explore whether people's organ donation consent decisions occur via a reasoned and/or social reaction pathway.
We examined prospectively students' and community members' decisions to register consent on a donor register and discuss organ donation wishes with family.
Participants completed items assessing theory of planned behaviour (TPB; attitude, subjective norm, perceived behavioural control (PBC)), prototype/willingness model (PWM; donor prototype favourability/similarity, past behaviour), and proposed additional influences (moral norm, self-identity, recipient prototypes) for registering (N=339) and discussing (N=315) intentions/willingness. Participants self-reported their registering (N=177) and discussing (N=166) behaviour 1 month later. The utility of the (1) TPB, (2) PWM, (3) augmented TPB with PWM, and (4) augmented TPB with PWM and extensions was tested using structural equation modelling for registering and discussing intentions/willingness, and logistic regression for behaviour.
While the TPB proved a more parsimonious model, fit indices suggested that the other proposed models offered viable options, explaining greater variance in communication intentions/willingness. The TPB, augmented TPB with PWM, and extended augmented TPB with PWM best explained registering and discussing decisions. The proposed and revised PWM also proved an adequate fit for discussing decisions. Respondents with stronger intentions (and PBC for registering) had a higher likelihood of registering and discussing.
People's decisions to communicate donation wishes may be better explained via a reasoned pathway (especially for registering); however, discussing involves more reactive elements. The role of moral norm, self-identity, and prototypes as influences predicting communication decisions were highlighted also.
探讨人们的器官捐赠同意决定是否通过理性和/或社会反应途径做出。
我们前瞻性地考察了学生和社区成员在捐赠登记处注册同意以及与家人讨论器官捐赠意愿的决定。
参与者完成了评估计划行为理论(TPB;态度、主观规范、感知行为控制(PBC))、原型/意愿模型(PWM;供体原型有利/相似性、过去行为)以及提出的额外影响因素(道德规范、自我认同、受体原型)的项目,以注册(N=339)和讨论(N=315)意图/意愿。参与者在 1 个月后自我报告了他们的注册(N=177)和讨论(N=166)行为。使用结构方程模型测试了(1)TPB、(2)PWM、(3)具有 PWM 的扩充 TPB 和(4)具有 PWM 和扩展的扩充 TPB 对注册和讨论意图/意愿的适用性,以及逻辑回归对行为的适用性。
虽然 TPB 证明是一个更简约的模型,但拟合指数表明,其他提出的模型提供了可行的选择,解释了沟通意图/意愿的更大差异。TPB、具有 PWM 的扩充 TPB 和具有 PWM 和扩充的扩充 TPB 最好地解释了注册和讨论决策。提出的和修订后的 PWM 也被证明适合讨论决策。意图较强(注册时 PBC 较强)的受访者更有可能进行注册和讨论。
人们沟通捐赠意愿的决定可能通过理性途径(尤其是注册)得到更好的解释;然而,讨论涉及更多的反应性因素。还强调了道德规范、自我认同和原型作为预测沟通决策的影响因素的作用。