Renaud Bertrand, Santin Aline, Coma Eva, Camus Nicolas, Van Pelt Dave, Hayon Jan, Gurgui Merce, Roupie Eric, Hervé Jérôme, Fine Michael J, Brun-Buisson Christian, Labarère José
Department of Emergency Medicine, AP-HP, Groupe Hospitalier Henri Mondor-Albert Chenevier, Créteil, France.
Crit Care Med. 2009 Nov;37(11):2867-74. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181b02dbb.
To compare the 28-day mortality and hospital length of stay of patients with community-acquired pneumonia who were transferred to an intensive care unit on the same day of emergency department presentation (direct-transfer patients) with those subsequently transferred within 3 days of presentation (delayed-transfer patients).
Secondary analysis of the original data from two North American and two European prospective, multicenter, cohort studies of adult patients with community-acquired pneumonia.
In all, 453 non-institutionalized patients transferred within 3 days of emergency department presentation to an intensive care unit were included in the analysis. Supplementary analysis was restricted to patients without an obvious indication for immediate transfer to an intensive care unit.
None.
The sample consisted of 138 delayed-transfer and 315 direct-transfer patients, among whom 150 (33.1%) were considered to have an obvious indication for immediate intensive care unit admission. After adjusting for the quintile of propensity score, delayed intensive care unit transfer was associated with an increased odds ratio for 28-day mortality (2.07; 95% confidence interval, 1.12-3.85) and a decreased odds ratio for discharge from hospital for survivors (0.53; 95% confidence interval, 0.39-0.71). In a propensity-matched analysis, delayed-transfer patients had a higher 28-day mortality rate (23.4% vs. 11.7%; p = 0.02) and a longer median hospital length of stay (13 days vs. 7 days; p < .001) than direct-transfer patients. Similar results were found after excluding the 150 patients with an obvious indication for immediate intensive care unit admission.
Our findings suggest that some patients without major criteria for severe community-acquired pneumonia, according to the recent Infectious Diseases Society of America/American Thoracic Society consensus guideline, may benefit from direct transfer to the intensive care unit. Further studies are needed to prospectively identify patients who may benefit from direct intensive care unit admission despite a lack of major severity criteria for community-acquired pneumonia based on the current guidelines.
比较在急诊科就诊当日即转入重症监护病房的社区获得性肺炎患者(直接转入患者)与在就诊后3天内转入的患者(延迟转入患者)的28天死亡率和住院时间。
对两项北美和两项欧洲针对成年社区获得性肺炎患者的前瞻性、多中心队列研究的原始数据进行二次分析。
共有453例在急诊科就诊后3天内转入重症监护病房的非机构化患者纳入分析。补充分析仅限于无明显立即转入重症监护病房指征的患者。
无。
样本包括138例延迟转入患者和315例直接转入患者,其中150例(33.1%)被认为有明显的立即入住重症监护病房的指征。在对倾向评分五分位数进行调整后,延迟转入重症监护病房与28天死亡率的比值比增加(2.07;95%置信区间,1.12 - 3.85)以及幸存者出院的比值比降低(0.53;95%置信区间,0.39 - 0.71)相关。在倾向匹配分析中,延迟转入患者的28天死亡率更高(23.4%对11.7%;p = 0.02),中位住院时间更长(13天对7天;p < 0.001)。在排除150例有明显立即入住重症监护病房指征的患者后,发现了类似结果。
我们的研究结果表明,根据美国传染病学会/美国胸科学会最近的共识指南,一些无严重社区获得性肺炎主要标准的患者可能从直接转入重症监护病房中获益。需要进一步研究以前瞻性地确定尽管根据当前指南缺乏社区获得性肺炎严重程度主要标准但可能从直接入住重症监护病房中获益的患者。