Hein Marc, Roehl Anna B, Baumert Jan H, Rossaint Rolf, Steendijk Paul
Department of Anesthesiology, University Hospital, RWTH Aachen, Germany.
Crit Care Med. 2009 Nov;37(11):2962-7. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181b027a5.
To evaluate the accuracy of right ventricular ejection fraction and right ventricular end-diastolic volume obtained by volumetric pulmonary artery catheter, using the conductance catheter as reference method.
Prospective, comparative study.
Research laboratory of a university hospital.
Seven young female German landrace pigs.
Ligation of the distal right coronary artery to induce temporary acute ischemia.
Right ventricular ejection fraction and right ventricular end-diastolic volume were measured simultaneously with a volumetric pulmonary artery catheter and the conductance catheter technique (reference method), in an animal model of acute right ventricular ischemia. Measurements were performed at baseline, during ischemia, and during reperfusion. The methods were compared with Bland-Altman analyses and their diagnostic accuracy to detect ischemia was quantified by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. For right ventricular ejection fraction measurements, Bland-Altman analysis indicated a bias of -9.9% indicating underestimation by pulmonary artery catheter with limits of agreement ranging from -26% to 6.1%. The data showed a trend for more underestimation at higher right ventricular ejection fraction values. For right ventricular end-diastolic volume, a bias of 31 mL, indicating overestimation by pulmonary artery catheter was found. Limits of agreement ranged from -25 mL to 88 mL. Ischemia induced a decrease in right ventricular ejection fraction and an increase in right ventricular end-diastolic volume, as expected, which was detected by conductance catheter with a significant higher diagnostic accuracy indicated by a receiver operating characteristic area under the curve of 0.98 (p < .001) and 0.92 (p < .001), respectively. Corresponding sensitivity and specificity were 100% and 86%, respectively, for right ventricular ejection fraction conductance catheter (cutoff value = <40%), and 86% and 100% for right ventricular end-diastolic volume conductance catheter (cutoff value = >94 mL). However, diagnostic accuracy for right ventricular ejection fraction pulmonary artery catheter and end-diastolic volume pulmonary artery catheter to detect ischemia was limited with area under the curve 0.76 (p = .06) and 0.57 (p = .65), respectively.
Accuracy of volumetric pulmonary artery catheter in conditions of right ventricular ischemia is low and inadequate for diagnosis of right ventricular ischemia and failure.
以电导导管作为参考方法,评估容积肺动脉导管所测得的右心室射血分数和右心室舒张末期容积的准确性。
前瞻性比较研究。
大学医院的研究实验室。
7只年轻雌性德国长白猪。
结扎右冠状动脉远端以诱发暂时性急性缺血。
在急性右心室缺血动物模型中,同时使用容积肺动脉导管和电导导管技术(参考方法)测量右心室射血分数和右心室舒张末期容积。在基线期、缺血期和再灌注期进行测量。采用Bland-Altman分析对两种方法进行比较,并通过受试者工作特征曲线分析量化它们检测缺血的诊断准确性。对于右心室射血分数测量,Bland-Altman分析显示偏差为-9.9%,表明肺动脉导管测量值偏低,一致性界限为-26%至6.1%。数据显示,在较高的右心室射血分数值时,有更多低估的趋势。对于右心室舒张末期容积,发现偏差为31 mL,表明肺动脉导管测量值偏高。一致性界限为-25 mL至88 mL。正如预期的那样,缺血导致右心室射血分数降低和右心室舒张末期容积增加,电导导管检测到了这一变化,其诊断准确性显著更高,右心室射血分数的受试者工作特征曲线下面积为0.98(p < 0.001),右心室舒张末期容积的受试者工作特征曲线下面积为0.92(p < 0.001)。右心室射血分数电导导管(截断值 = <40%)的相应敏感性和特异性分别为100%和86%,右心室舒张末期容积电导导管(截断值 = >94 mL)的相应敏感性和特异性分别为86%和100%。然而,肺动脉导管测量右心室射血分数和舒张末期容积以检测缺血的诊断准确性有限,曲线下面积分别为0.76(p = 0.06)和0.57(p = 0.65)。
在右心室缺血情况下,容积肺动脉导管的准确性较低,不足以诊断右心室缺血和衰竭。