Suppr超能文献

二氧化碳激光与传统镫骨切除术效果的比较。

A comparison of CO2 laser versus traditional stapedectomy outcomes.

作者信息

Ryan S, Thornton M A, Kieran S, Charles D

机构信息

Royal Victoria Eye and Ear Hospital, Dublin.

出版信息

Ir Med J. 2009 Jul-Aug;102(7):218-20.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to audit the introduction of the use of the CO2 laser into our department and to compare hearing outcomes and complication rates in patients who underwent either laser or mechanical stapedectomy. We found that the use of laser is at least as safe as the traditional approach with regards the rate of post-operative complications. One patient in the laser group suffered prolonged post-operative tinnitus, whilst one patient in the traditional group suffered prolonged post-operative vertigo. There was no evidence, however, of improved Air-Bone Gap closure compared to the traditional approach (Pre- and Post-Op Air Bone Gaps of 34 +/- 3 and 9 +/- 2 for laser stapedectomy versus 35 +/- 4 and 13 +/- 2 for traditional stapedectomy (mean +/- SEM)). In summary, therefore, CO2 laser surgery for otosclerosis is a safe surgical procedure resulting in similar hearing outcomes to that obtained following mechanical stapes surgery.

摘要

本研究的目的是审查二氧化碳激光在我们科室的引入情况,并比较接受激光镫骨切除术或机械镫骨切除术患者的听力结果和并发症发生率。我们发现,就术后并发症发生率而言,激光的使用至少与传统方法一样安全。激光组有1例患者术后耳鸣持续时间延长,而传统组有1例患者术后眩晕持续时间延长。然而,与传统方法相比,没有证据表明气骨导间距闭合情况有所改善(激光镫骨切除术术前和气骨导间距为34±3,术后为9±2;传统镫骨切除术术前和气骨导间距为35±4,术后为13±2(平均值±标准误))。因此,综上所述,二氧化碳激光治疗耳硬化症是一种安全的外科手术,其听力结果与机械镫骨手术相似。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验