Suppr超能文献

麻醉学能力评估。

Assessment of competence in anesthesiology.

机构信息

Center for Anesthesiology Education, Anesthesiology Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA.

出版信息

Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2009 Dec;22(6):809-13. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0b013e3283326958.

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review is designed to evaluate various aspects of the teaching, demonstration and assessment of competence in anesthesiology.

RECENT FINDINGS

The approach to evaluation of competence has evolved from global impressions to an understanding of the elements of performance that determine competence. This assessment of performance to measure competence has been applied to cognitive performance, technical skills, and behavior. There is increasing consensus that assessment of competence is more effective when more than one tool is used, and when the tool selected actually measures the element of competence it was selected to measure.

SUMMARY

The traditional evaluation of clinical competence in anesthesiology has focused on written examinations and global evaluation of skill. Limits to this approach have become obvious. Assessment has evolved to specific competencies with performance and behavior-based standards and criteria for mastery of each competency. As standards for competency are better understood, multimedia tools, such as simulation and electronic portfolio, will further advance this evolution.

摘要

目的综述

本文旨在评估麻醉学教学、演示和能力评估的各个方面。

最近的发现

对能力的评估方法已经从整体印象发展到对决定能力的绩效要素的理解。为了衡量能力而对绩效的这种评估已应用于认知绩效、技术技能和行为。越来越多的人认为,当使用多种工具时,以及当所选工具实际上测量了它被选择来测量的能力要素时,对能力的评估更有效。

总结

传统的麻醉学临床能力评估侧重于书面考试和技能的整体评估。这种方法的局限性已经变得明显。评估已经发展到具有特定能力的绩效和基于行为的标准和掌握每个能力的标准。随着对能力标准的理解的提高,多媒体工具,如模拟和电子档案,将进一步推动这一发展。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验