Suppr超能文献

外科住院医师培训中的能力:定义并提高标准。

Competency in surgical residency training: defining and raising the bar.

作者信息

Bhatti Nasir I, Cummings Charles W

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21287, USA.

出版信息

Acad Med. 2007 Jun;82(6):569-73. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3180555bfb.

Abstract

Competency-based surgical residency training is rapidly becoming the norm across surgical specialties. Ensuring that graduating surgeons are competent to deliver the necessary services and skills to their patients remains a seminal objective of training programs. Defining surgical competence, the measures used to assess and quantify that competence, and the criteria used to judge whether it has been achieved are critical issues. The bar that surgical residency programs have established is, and must continue to be, set very high. Definitions of competency differ across disciplines. In education, two approaches are recognized. According to the behaviorist approach, competence is assessed by precise measures of performance, generally documented by checklists. The integrated (holistic) approach defines competence as a complex combination of personal attributes. Assessments of competence also fall under two categories: the traditional scientific paradigm, emphasizing objectivity and reproducibility, and the judgment paradigm, reflecting the need to assess clinical competence in the final stages of medical training. In surgery, competence is the ability to successfully apply professional knowledge, skills, and attitudes to new situations as well as to familiar tasks. A critical step in assessing surgical competency is developing methodology for competency evaluation and certification. Matching different aspects of surgical competency with the appropriate assessment instruments is the theme of the contemporary evaluation process, with emphasis on a whole-task approach and the assessment of professional judgment. An effective assessment program will incorporate several competency elements, using multiple sources of information to assess competencies on multiple occasions, at various levels, and in different settings.

摘要

基于胜任力的外科住院医师培训正迅速成为各外科专业的常态。确保毕业的外科医生有能力为患者提供必要的服务和技能仍然是培训项目的一项重要目标。界定外科胜任力、用于评估和量化该胜任力的措施以及用于判断是否已实现该胜任力的标准是关键问题。外科住院医师培训项目所设定的标准过去是、而且必须继续是非常高的。不同学科对胜任力的定义有所不同。在教育领域,有两种方法得到认可。根据行为主义方法,胜任力通过对表现的精确测量来评估,通常以清单记录。综合(整体)方法将胜任力定义为个人特质的复杂组合。胜任力评估也分为两类:传统的科学范式,强调客观性和可重复性;以及判断范式,反映了在医学培训最后阶段评估临床胜任力的必要性。在外科领域,胜任力是指成功地将专业知识、技能和态度应用于新情况以及熟悉任务的能力。评估外科胜任力的关键一步是开发胜任力评估和认证方法。将外科胜任力的不同方面与适当的评估工具相匹配是当代评估过程的主题,重点是全任务方法和专业判断评估。一个有效的评估项目将纳入多个胜任力要素,利用多种信息来源在多个场合、不同层面和不同环境中评估胜任力。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验