Department of Biological Sciences, Macquarie University, North Ryde, NSW 2109, Australia.
Proc Biol Sci. 2009 Dec 22;276(1677):4335-43. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2009.1226. Epub 2009 Sep 23.
Sexual selection is thought to be opposed by natural selection such that ornamental traits express a balance between these two antagonistic influences. Phenotypic variation among populations may indicate local shifts in this balance, or that different stable 'solutions' are possible, but testing these alternatives presents a major challenge. In the guppy (Poecilia reticulata), a small freshwater fish with male-limited ornamental coloration, these issues can be addressed by transplanting fish among sites of varying predation pressure, thus effectively manipulating the strength and nature of natural selection. Here, we contrast the evolutionary outcome of two such introductions conducted in the Trinidadian El Cedro and Aripo Rivers. We use sophisticated colour appraisal methods that account for full spectrum colour variation and which incorporate the very latest visual sensitivity data for guppies and their predators. Our data indicate that ornamentation evolved along different trajectories: whereas Aripo males evolved more numerous and/or larger orange, black and iridescent markings, El Cedro males only evolved more extensive and brighter iridescence. Examination of the El Cedro experiment also revealed little or no ornamental evolution at the control site over 29 years, which contrasts markedly with the rapid (approx. 2-3 years) changes reported for introduction populations. Finally, whole colour-pattern analysis suggested that the greatest visual difference between El Cedro introduction and control fish would be perceived by the two most salient viewers: guppies and the putatively dangerous predator Crenicichla alta. We discuss whether and how these evolutionary trajectories may result from founder effects, population-specific mate preferences and/or sensory drive.
性选择被认为与自然选择相对立,因此装饰性特征表达了这两种拮抗影响之间的平衡。种群之间的表型变异可能表明这种平衡发生了局部变化,或者可能存在不同的稳定“解决方案”,但检验这些替代方案是一个主要的挑战。在小型淡水鱼孔雀鱼(Poecilia reticulata)中,雄性具有有限的装饰性色彩,通过在捕食压力不同的地点之间移植鱼类,可以解决这些问题,从而有效地操纵自然选择的强度和性质。在这里,我们对比了在特立尼达的埃尔塞德罗河(El Cedro River)和阿里波河(Aripo River)进行的两次这样的引入实验的进化结果。我们使用了复杂的颜色评估方法,这些方法考虑了全光谱颜色变化,并纳入了孔雀鱼及其捕食者的最新视觉敏感性数据。我们的数据表明,装饰物的进化轨迹不同:阿里波的雄性进化出了更多的橙色、黑色和虹彩斑纹,且数量更多或更大,而埃尔塞德罗的雄性只进化出了更广泛和更明亮的虹彩。对埃尔塞德罗实验的检查还表明,在 29 年的时间里,对照点的装饰物几乎没有进化,这与引入种群报告的快速(约 2-3 年)变化形成鲜明对比。最后,整体颜色图案分析表明,埃尔塞德罗引入和对照鱼之间最大的视觉差异将被两个最显著的观察者感知:孔雀鱼和假定的危险捕食者高臀脂鲤(Crenicichla alta)。我们讨论了这些进化轨迹是否以及如何可能是由奠基者效应、种群特有的配偶偏好和/或感官驱动引起的。