• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

DSM 未特定性性癖障碍的诊断标准。

The DSM diagnostic criteria for paraphilia not otherwise specified.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, McLean Hospital, 115 Mill Street, Belmont, MA 02478, USA.

出版信息

Arch Sex Behav. 2010 Apr;39(2):373-6. doi: 10.1007/s10508-009-9552-0.

DOI:10.1007/s10508-009-9552-0
PMID:19779971
Abstract

The category of "Not Otherwise Specified" (NOS) for DSM-based psychiatric diagnosis has typically retained diagnoses whose rarity, empirical criterion validation or symptomatic expression has been insufficient to be codified. This article reviews the literature on Telephone Scatologia, Necrophilia, Zoophilia, Urophilia, Coprophilia, and Partialism. Based on extant data, no changes are suggested except for the status of Partialism. Partialism, sexual arousal characterized by "an exclusive focus on part of the body," had historically been subsumed as a type of Fetishism until the advent of DSM-III-R. The rationale for considering the removal of Partialism from Paraphilia NOS and its reintegration as a specifier for Fetishism is discussed here and in a companion review on the DSM diagnostic criteria for fetishism (Kafka, 2009). In the DSM-IV and DSM-IV-TR, the essential features of a Paraphilia are recurrent, intense sexually arousing fantasies, sexual urges or behaviors generally involving nonhuman objects, the suffering or humiliation of oneself or one's partner, or children or other nonconsenting persons that occur over a period of at least 6 months (Criterion A). Given consideration for the erotic focus of Partialism and Autoerotic Asphyxia, amending the operational criteria for Paraphilia should be considered to include an atypical focus involving human subjects (self or others).

摘要

DSM 为基础的精神科诊断中“未特定”(NOS)类别通常保留了那些罕见、经验标准验证或症状表现不足以为其编码的诊断。本文回顾了有关电话性施虐、恋尸癖、恋兽癖、尿恋癖、粪恋癖和部分主义的文献。基于现有数据,除了部分主义的地位外,不建议进行任何更改。部分主义是指“对身体的某个部分的排他性关注”的性唤起特征,在 DSM-III-R 出现之前,它一直被归入恋物癖的一种类型。考虑将部分主义从性变态 NOS 中删除,并将其重新整合为恋物癖的一个特征的理由在这里以及在关于恋物癖 DSM 诊断标准的伴随评论中进行了讨论(卡夫卡,2009 年)。在 DSM-IV 和 DSM-IV-TR 中,性变态的基本特征是反复出现的、强烈的性唤起幻想、性冲动或行为,通常涉及非人类物体,涉及自己或伴侣的痛苦或羞辱,或儿童或其他非同意的人,持续至少 6 个月(标准 A)。考虑到部分主义和自慰性窒息的色情焦点,应该考虑修改性变态的操作标准,以包括涉及人类主体(自己或他人)的非典型焦点。

相似文献

1
The DSM diagnostic criteria for paraphilia not otherwise specified.DSM 未特定性性癖障碍的诊断标准。
Arch Sex Behav. 2010 Apr;39(2):373-6. doi: 10.1007/s10508-009-9552-0.
2
The DSM diagnostic criteria for fetishism.DSM 恋物癖诊断标准。
Arch Sex Behav. 2010 Apr;39(2):357-62. doi: 10.1007/s10508-009-9558-7.
3
Drug treatment of paraphilic and nonparaphilic sexual disorders.性偏好障碍和非性偏好性性功能障碍的药物治疗。
Clin Ther. 2009 Jan;31(1):1-31. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2009.01.009.
4
Sexual disorders not otherwise specified: compulsive, addictive, or impulsive?未特定说明的性障碍:强迫性的、成瘾性的还是冲动性的?
CNS Spectr. 2000 Jan;5(1):60-4. doi: 10.1017/s1092852900012670.
5
Hebephilia is not a mental disorder in DSM-IV-TR and should not become one in DSM-5.在 DSM-IV-TR 中,恋童癖不是一种精神障碍,在 DSM-5 中也不应该成为一种精神障碍。
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2011;39(1):78-85.
6
Sex, immorality, and mental disorders.性别、不道德行为与精神障碍。
J Med Philos. 2009 Oct;34(5):487-95. doi: 10.1093/jmp/jhp037. Epub 2009 Aug 18.
7
Use of DSM paraphilia diagnoses in sexually violent predator commitment cases.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》(DSM)中恋癖诊断在性暴力惯犯定罪案件中的应用。
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2008;36(4):443-54.
8
Defining paraphilia in DSM-5: do not disregard grammar.DSM-5 中定义性变态:语法不可忽视。
J Sex Marital Ther. 2011;37(1):17-31. doi: 10.1080/0092623X.2011.533567.
9
Paraphilia NOS, nonconsent: not ready for the courtroom.性癖好障碍,非同意:还没准备好上法庭。
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2011;39(4):555-61.
10
The DSM diagnostic criteria for exhibitionism, voyeurism, and frotteurism.DSM 中关于露阴癖、窥阴癖和摩擦癖的诊断标准。
Arch Sex Behav. 2010 Apr;39(2):317-24. doi: 10.1007/s10508-009-9577-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Critical evaluation of arguments opposing male circumcision: A systematic review.批判反对男性割礼观点的评估:系统综述。
J Evid Based Med. 2019 Nov;12(4):263-290. doi: 10.1111/jebm.12361. Epub 2019 Sep 8.
2
Proposals for Paraphilic Disorders in the International Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Eleventh Revision (ICD-11).《国际疾病分类及相关健康问题第十一次修订本》(ICD - 11)中关于性偏好障碍的提案。
Arch Sex Behav. 2017 Jul;46(5):1529-1545. doi: 10.1007/s10508-017-0944-2. Epub 2017 Feb 16.
3
Critical evaluation of unscientific arguments disparaging affirmative infant male circumcision policy.
对诋毁男性婴儿包皮环切术肯定性政策的非科学论点的批判性评估。
World J Clin Pediatr. 2016 Aug 8;5(3):251-61. doi: 10.5409/wjcp.v5.i3.251.
4
Splitting hairs: differentiating between entomological activity, taphonomy, and sharp force trauma on hair.吹毛求疵:区分毛发上的昆虫活动、尸体变化规律和锐器伤。
Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2015 Mar;11(1):104-10. doi: 10.1007/s12024-014-9636-6. Epub 2014 Dec 21.