Zhang Ying-Ze, Guo Ming-Ke, Zheng Zhan-le, Zhang Qi, Chen Wei
Emergency Center of Traumatic Orthopaedics, the Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China.
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2009 Jun 15;47(12):896-8.
To assess the effect of the different treatments targeted at different types of radial head fracture and radial neck fracture.
A retrospective study was performed in 87 patients from February 2006 to March 2007. Fifty-four patients with radial head fractures included 36 males and 18 females, aged from 18 to 65 years (the average age was 33); Forty of them resulted from crashing, 8 from traffic injury and 6 from falling injury. According to Mason classification system, there were 15 type I, 23 type II and 16 type III. Thirty-three patients with radial neck fractures included 21 males and 12 females, aged from 9 to 17 years (the average age was 13), 29 of them resulted from crashing, 1 from traffic injury and 3 from falling injury. According to O'Brien classification system, there were 8 type I, 14 type II and 11 type III. Type I of radial head fractures and radial neck fractures were immobilization with cast, the patients with type II of radial head fractures were treated with open reduction and micro-screw or T-trapezoid and bridge-shaped plate fixation and type III had operations to fix with bridge-shaped locked plate and repair the broken annular ligament, or replace heads with prosthesis. All patients with type II and type III of radial neck fractures were treated with closed reduction by leverage and percutaneous intra-medullary nailing.
The patients were followed up for 4-12 months (mean 7.2 months). The functional recovery degrees were evaluated with Wheeler's evaluation system. In group of radial head fractures, the results were excellent in 26 patients, good in 20, fair in 6 and poor in 2, the excellent and good rate was 85.2%. In group of radial neck fractures, the results were excellent in 20 patients, good in 9, fair in 4 and poor in no patient, and the excellent and good rate was 87.9%.
Different types of fractures should choose different surgical methods according to their characters. The excellent functional recovery depend on anatomical reduction, retaining the head of radius, early repairing and protecting the broken annular ligament of radius, and early functional training.
评估针对不同类型桡骨头骨折和桡骨颈骨折的不同治疗方法的效果。
对2006年2月至2007年3月期间的87例患者进行回顾性研究。54例桡骨头骨折患者中,男性36例,女性18例,年龄18至65岁(平均年龄33岁);其中40例因碰撞所致,8例因交通伤,6例因坠落伤。根据Mason分类系统,I型15例,II型23例,III型16例。33例桡骨颈骨折患者中,男性21例,女性12例,年龄9至17岁(平均年龄13岁),29例因碰撞所致,1例因交通伤,3例因坠落伤。根据O'Brien分类系统,I型8例,II型14例,III型11例。桡骨头骨折和桡骨颈骨折的I型采用石膏固定,桡骨头骨折II型采用切开复位微型螺钉或T形梯形桥接钢板固定,III型采用桥接锁定钢板固定并修复断裂的环状韧带,或行假体置换。所有桡骨颈骨折II型和III型患者均采用撬拨复位经皮髓内钉固定治疗。
患者随访4至12个月(平均7.2个月)。采用Wheeler评估系统评估功能恢复程度。在桡骨头骨折组中,优26例,良20例,可6例,差2例,优良率为85.2%。在桡骨颈骨折组中,优20例,良9例,可4例,无差的病例,优良率为87.9%。
不同类型骨折应根据其特点选择不同的手术方法。良好的功能恢复取决于解剖复位、保留桡骨头、早期修复和保护断裂的桡骨环状韧带以及早期功能训练。