Suppr超能文献

生物可吸收吻合环在肠吻合术中的应用随机试验。

Randomized trial on the application of biofragmentable anastomosis ring in intestinal anastomosis.

机构信息

Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Second Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510120, China.

出版信息

Chin Med J (Engl). 2009 Aug 5;122(15):1755-8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The biofragmentable anastomosis ring (BAR) is a simple alternative device to create intestinal anastomosis. Our study was designed to evaluate the clinical value of BAR in intestinal anastomosis.

METHODS

A total of 167 patients performed intestinal anastomosis from January 2002 to February 2006 were randomized to BAR group (n = 82) and manual suture group (n = 85) as control. They were equally allocated to the two groups regarding sex, age, site of anastomosis, emergent or elective surgery and contaminant diseases. The results of postoperative complications and recovery were recorded in each group.

RESULTS

Eighty-seven intraperitoneal BAR anastomoses were completed in 82 patients. Two and one postoperative deaths were recorded in BAR and suture group, respectively, no deaths were directly related to anastomotic technique. In suture group, anastomotic leakage and early bleeding both occurred in two patients respectively, no anastomotic bleeding occurred in BAR group, one patient in BAR group developed enterocutaneous fistulae. Perioperative bleeding, operation time and length of hospitalization were similar in two groups (P > 0.05). Time for return of bowel function was significantly shortened in BAR group than that in suture group (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The BAR appears to be a standard, easy, safe and effective alternative either in elective or emergent intraperitoneal intestinal anastomotic surgery.

摘要

背景

可生物降解吻合环(BAR)是一种简单的替代装置,可用于创建肠吻合术。我们的研究旨在评估 BAR 在肠吻合术中的临床价值。

方法

2002 年 1 月至 2006 年 2 月,共有 167 例行肠吻合术的患者被随机分为 BAR 组(n = 82)和手工缝合组(n = 85)作为对照组。两组在性别、年龄、吻合部位、急诊或择期手术以及污染性疾病方面均均衡分配。记录每组术后并发症和恢复情况的结果。

结果

82 例患者完成了 87 例腹腔内 BAR 吻合术。BAR 组和缝合组各有 2 例和 1 例术后死亡,无死亡与吻合技术直接相关。在缝合组中,吻合口漏和早期出血分别发生在 2 例患者中,BAR 组无吻合口出血,BAR 组有 1 例患者发生肠外瘘。两组围手术期出血、手术时间和住院时间相似(P > 0.05)。BAR 组患者的肠道功能恢复时间明显短于缝合组(P < 0.05)。

结论

BAR 似乎是一种标准、简单、安全、有效的选择,无论是在择期还是急诊腹腔内肠吻合术中。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验