• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

压迫吻合环锁定术(CARP)是左侧结肠切除术后肠道吻合的一种安全有效的方法。

Compression anastomotic ring-locking procedure (CARP) is a safe and effective method for intestinal anastomoses following left-sided colonic resection.

作者信息

Vilhjalmsson Dadi, Appelros Stefan, Toth Ervin, Syk Ingvar, Grönberg Anders, Mynster Tommie, Thorlacius Henrik

机构信息

Department of Clinical Sciences, Section of Surgery, Lund University, 205 02, Malmö, Sweden.

出版信息

Int J Colorectal Dis. 2015 Jul;30(7):969-75. doi: 10.1007/s00384-015-2257-z. Epub 2015 May 20.

DOI:10.1007/s00384-015-2257-z
PMID:25989929
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Compression anastomotic ring-locking procedure (CARP) is a novel procedure for creating colonic anastomoses. The surgical procedure allows perioperative quantification of the compression pressure between the intestinal ends within the anastomosis and postoperative monitoring of the anastomotic integrity. We have recently shown that CARP is a safe and effective method for colonic anastomoses in pigs, and the purpose of the present study was to evaluate CARP for colonic anastomoses in humans.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a prospective study on 25 patients undergoing elective left-sided colonic resection. Time for evacuation of the anastomotic rings, perioperative compression pressure, and adverse effects were recorded. Postoperative blood samples were collected daily, and flexible sigmoidoscopy was performed 8-12 weeks after surgery to examine the anastomoses.

RESULTS

Fourteen out of 25 patients underwent CARP. CARP was not used in 11 patients due to advanced tumor disease (two cases) and size restrictions (nine cases). No case of anastomotic leakage, bowel obstruction, or stenosis formation was observed. No device-related perioperative adverse events were noted. The surgical device evacuated spontaneously in all patients by the natural route after a median of 10 days. Perioperative compression pressure ranged between 85 and 280 mBar (median 130 mBar). Flexible sigmoidoscopy revealed smooth anastomoses without signs of pathological inflammation or stenosis in all cases.

CONCLUSION

Our results indicate that the novel suture-less CARP is a safe and effective method for creating colonic anastomoses. Further studies are warranted in larger patient populations to compare CARP head-on-head with stapled and/or hand-sewn colonic anastomoses.

摘要

背景

压缩吻合环锁定术(CARP)是一种用于创建结肠吻合口的新方法。该手术允许在围手术期对吻合口内肠端之间的压缩压力进行量化,并在术后监测吻合口的完整性。我们最近表明,CARP是一种用于猪结肠吻合术的安全有效的方法,本研究的目的是评估CARP在人类结肠吻合术中的应用。

材料与方法

这是一项对25例接受择期左侧结肠切除术患者的前瞻性研究。记录吻合环排出时间、围手术期压缩压力和不良反应。每天采集术后血样,并在术后8 - 12周进行乙状结肠镜检查以检查吻合口。

结果

25例患者中有14例接受了CARP。由于肿瘤病情进展(2例)和尺寸限制(9例),11例患者未使用CARP。未观察到吻合口漏、肠梗阻或狭窄形成的病例。未发现与器械相关的围手术期不良事件。手术器械在中位时间10天后通过自然途径在所有患者中自发排出。围手术期压缩压力范围在85至280毫巴之间(中位值130毫巴)。乙状结肠镜检查显示所有病例的吻合口均光滑,无病理炎症或狭窄迹象。

结论

我们的结果表明,新型无缝合CARP是一种创建结肠吻合口的安全有效的方法。有必要在更大规模的患者群体中进行进一步研究,以将CARP与吻合器和/或手工缝合的结肠吻合术进行直接比较。

相似文献

1
Compression anastomotic ring-locking procedure (CARP) is a safe and effective method for intestinal anastomoses following left-sided colonic resection.压迫吻合环锁定术(CARP)是左侧结肠切除术后肠道吻合的一种安全有效的方法。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2015 Jul;30(7):969-75. doi: 10.1007/s00384-015-2257-z. Epub 2015 May 20.
2
The compression anastomotic ring-locking procedure: a novel technique for creating a sutureless colonic anastomosis.压迫吻合环锁定技术:一种创建无吻合钉结肠吻合术的新技术。
Eur Surg Res. 2015;54(3-4):139-47. doi: 10.1159/000368354. Epub 2014 Dec 16.
3
The biofragmentable ring in intestinal surgery.肠道手术中的生物可降解环
Eur J Surg Suppl. 1993(569):1-31.
4
Intestinal anastomosis by use of the biofragmentable anastomotic ring: is it safe and efficacious in emergency operations as well?使用生物可降解吻合环进行肠道吻合术:它在急诊手术中也安全有效吗?
Dis Colon Rectum. 1998 Oct;41(10):1281-6. doi: 10.1007/BF02258229.
5
Sutureless intestinal anastomosis with a novel device of magnetic compression anastomosis.使用新型磁压缩吻合装置进行无缝合肠吻合术。
Chin Med Sci J. 2011 Sep;26(3):182-9. doi: 10.1016/s1001-9294(11)60046-1.
6
Comparison between the biofragmentable anastomosis ring and stapled anastomoses in the extraperitoneal rectum: a prospective, randomized study.腹膜外直肠生物可降解吻合环与吻合器吻合术的比较:一项前瞻性随机研究。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 1999 Dec;14(6):286-90. doi: 10.1007/s003840050230.
7
Transanal formation of anastomosis using C-REX device is feasible and effective in high anterior resection.经肛门使用 C-REX 吻合器重建吻合术在高位前切除术是可行且有效的。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2023 May 13;38(1):127. doi: 10.1007/s00384-023-04420-x.
8
"Tie over ring" sutureless compression based gastrointestinal anastomotic method: experimental rat model.“套环”无缝合压迫式胃肠吻合方法:大鼠实验模型
J Pediatr Surg. 2014 Mar;49(3):405-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2013.07.007.
9
Randomized trial on the application of biofragmentable anastomosis ring in intestinal anastomosis.生物可吸收吻合环在肠吻合术中的应用随机试验。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2009 Aug 5;122(15):1755-8.
10
Optimized force range of magnetic compression anastomosis in dog intestinal tissue.优化磁压榨吻合术在犬肠组织中的力学范围。
J Pediatr Surg. 2019 Oct;54(10):2166-2171. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2019.03.005. Epub 2019 Mar 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of the C-REX LapAid and Circular Stapled Colorectal Anastomoses in an Experimental Model.C-REX LapAid与圆形吻合器在结直肠吻合术中的实验模型比较。
Eur Surg Res. 2025;66(1):9-17. doi: 10.1159/000543069. Epub 2025 Feb 11.
2
Transanal formation of anastomosis using C-REX device is feasible and effective in high anterior resection.经肛门使用 C-REX 吻合器重建吻合术在高位前切除术是可行且有效的。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2023 May 13;38(1):127. doi: 10.1007/s00384-023-04420-x.
3
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on Colorectal Anastomotic Techniques.

本文引用的文献

1
The compression anastomotic ring-locking procedure: a novel technique for creating a sutureless colonic anastomosis.压迫吻合环锁定技术:一种创建无吻合钉结肠吻合术的新技术。
Eur Surg Res. 2015;54(3-4):139-47. doi: 10.1159/000368354. Epub 2014 Dec 16.
2
Complications of colorectal anastomoses: leaks, strictures, and bleeding.结直肠吻合口并发症:漏、狭窄和出血。
Surg Clin North Am. 2013 Feb;93(1):61-87. doi: 10.1016/j.suc.2012.09.014. Epub 2012 Oct 27.
3
Compression anastomoses in colorectal surgery: a review.结直肠外科中的压缩吻合术:综述。
结直肠吻合技术的系统评价与Meta分析
Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2022 May 4;18:523-539. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S335102. eCollection 2022.
4
A systematic analysis of controlled clinical trials using the NiTi CAR™ compression ring in colorectal anastomoses.一项使用镍钛合金CAR™压缩环进行结直肠吻合术的对照临床试验的系统分析。
Tech Coloproctol. 2017 Mar;21(3):177-184. doi: 10.1007/s10151-017-1583-2. Epub 2017 Jan 28.
Tech Coloproctol. 2012 Jun;16(3):187-99. doi: 10.1007/s10151-012-0825-6. Epub 2012 Apr 26.
4
Stapled versus handsewn methods for colorectal anastomosis surgery.结直肠吻合手术中吻合器与手工缝合方法的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Feb 15;2012(2):CD003144. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003144.pub2.
5
Compression anastomoses in colon and rectal surgery with the NiTi ColonRing™.镍钛合金结肠吻合环在结肠和直肠手术中的吻合。
Tech Coloproctol. 2012 Feb;16(1):29-35. doi: 10.1007/s10151-011-0794-1. Epub 2011 Dec 3.
6
Increased local recurrence and reduced survival from colorectal cancer following anastomotic leak: systematic review and meta-analysis.吻合口漏后结直肠癌局部复发率增加和生存率降低:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ann Surg. 2011 May;253(5):890-9. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182128929.
7
The use of a compression device as an alternative to hand-sewn and stapled colorectal anastomoses: is three a crowd?使用压缩设备替代手工缝合和吻合器吻合结直肠:是否人多手杂?
J Gastrointest Surg. 2011 Feb;15(2):304-10. doi: 10.1007/s11605-010-1376-7. Epub 2010 Nov 10.
8
Techniques for colorectal anastomosis.结直肠吻合技术。
World J Gastroenterol. 2010 Apr 7;16(13):1610-21. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i13.1610.
9
Randomized trial on the application of biofragmentable anastomosis ring in intestinal anastomosis.生物可吸收吻合环在肠吻合术中的应用随机试验。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2009 Aug 5;122(15):1755-8.
10
Diagnostic accuracy of C-reactive protein for intraabdominal infections after colorectal resections.C反应蛋白对结直肠切除术后腹腔内感染的诊断准确性
J Gastrointest Surg. 2009 Sep;13(9):1599-606. doi: 10.1007/s11605-009-0928-1. Epub 2009 May 29.