• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

TRI支架判定研究(TRIAS)项目的设计与原理

Design and rationale of the TRI-stent adjudication study (TRIAS) program.

作者信息

Klomp Margo, Beijk Marcel A M, Verouden Niels J W, Tijssen Jan G P, de Winter Robbert J

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Am Heart J. 2009 Oct;158(4):527-532.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2009.07.022.

DOI:10.1016/j.ahj.2009.07.022
PMID:19781410
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In the treatment of coronary artery disease, a "pro-healing" approach for prevention of in-stent restenosis and late stent thrombosis is intuitively favored over the use of cytotoxic or cytostatic drugs released from a drug-eluting stent (DES). Promoting accelerated endothelial coverage of the stent surface, the endothelial progenitor cell (EPC) capturing stent has shown its safety and efficacy in the HEALING observational studies; however, randomized trials evaluating the device are lacking.

METHODS

The multicenter, randomized, controlled, 2-armed TRIAS program aims to include a total of 2560 patients. In the TRIAS Low Risk trial, a total of 1300 patients with lesions carrying a low risk of restenosis are randomized between the EPC capturing stent and a bare metal stent, assuming superiority in the incidence of target lesion failure (TLF) at 1 year. In the TRIAS High Risk trial, 1260 patients with lesions carrying a high risk of restenosis are randomized, assuming the noninferiority in TLF at 1 year of the EPC capturing stent as compared to DES. TLF is defined as the composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and clinically driven target lesion revascularization. In addition, the duration of clinical follow-up is extended to 5 years to capture late events. Angiographic follow-up at 13 months is performed as part of the TRIAS Program ancillary study.

IMPLICATION

The results of the TRIAS Program will provide information on a relevant patient population with coronary artery lesions, comprising the full spectrum of low risk and high risk of restenosis treated with a novel stent technology in a randomized, controlled manner (TRIAS Low Risk trial: ISRCTN 47701105 and TRIAS High Risk trial: ISRCTN 74297220).

摘要

背景

在冠心病治疗中,相较于药物洗脱支架(DES)释放的细胞毒性或细胞抑制药物,一种“促进愈合”的方法用于预防支架内再狭窄和晚期支架血栓形成在直观上更受青睐。内皮祖细胞(EPC)捕获支架可促进支架表面内皮覆盖加速,在HEALING观察性研究中已显示出其安全性和有效性;然而,缺乏评估该装置的随机试验。

方法

多中心、随机、对照、双臂TRIAS项目旨在共纳入2560例患者。在TRIAS低风险试验中,共1300例再狭窄风险低的病变患者被随机分配至EPC捕获支架组和裸金属支架组,假设1年时靶病变失败(TLF)发生率具有优越性。在TRIAS高风险试验中,1260例再狭窄风险高的病变患者被随机分组,假设EPC捕获支架在1年时的TLF不劣于DES。TLF定义为心源性死亡、心肌梗死和临床驱动的靶病变血运重建的复合终点。此外,临床随访时间延长至5年以捕捉晚期事件。作为TRIAS项目辅助研究的一部分,在13个月时进行血管造影随访。

意义

TRIAS项目的结果将为患有冠状动脉病变的相关患者群体提供信息,该群体包括以随机、对照方式接受新型支架技术治疗的再狭窄低风险和高风险的全谱患者(TRIAS低风险试验:ISRCTN 47701105;TRIAS高风险试验:ISRCTN 74297220)。

相似文献

1
Design and rationale of the TRI-stent adjudication study (TRIAS) program.TRI支架判定研究(TRIAS)项目的设计与原理
Am Heart J. 2009 Oct;158(4):527-532.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2009.07.022.
2
1-year outcome of TRIAS HR (TRI-stent adjudication study-high risk of restenosis) a multicenter, randomized trial comparing genous endothelial progenitor cell capturing stents with drug-eluting stents.TRIAS HR(TRI-支架判定研究-高再狭窄风险)的 1 年结果:一项比较同源内皮祖细胞捕获支架与药物洗脱支架的多中心、随机试验。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2011 Aug;4(8):896-904. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2011.05.011.
3
Two-year follow-up of the Genous™ endothelial progenitor cell capturing stent versus the Taxus Liberté stent in patients with de novo coronary artery lesions with a high-risk of restenosis: a randomized, single-center, pilot study.新发冠状动脉病变高危再狭窄患者中内皮祖细胞捕获支架与 Taxus Liberté 支架的两年随访:一项随机、单中心、先导研究。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2011 Aug 1;78(2):189-95. doi: 10.1002/ccd.23143. Epub 2011 Jul 15.
4
Rationale and design of the randomized, multicenter EREMUS trial, a study that investigates how to achieve low restenosis and early reendothelialization after percutaneous coronary interventions.随机、多中心 EREMUS 试验的原理和设计,该研究旨在探讨如何在经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后实现低再狭窄和早期再内皮化。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2011 Jul 1;78(1):32-7. doi: 10.1002/ccd.22856. Epub 2011 Mar 16.
5
Short- and long-term outcomes with drug-eluting and bare-metal coronary stents: a mixed-treatment comparison analysis of 117 762 patient-years of follow-up from randomized trials.药物洗脱支架和金属裸支架的短期和长期结果:来自随机试验的 117762 患者年随访的混合治疗比较分析。
Circulation. 2012 Jun 12;125(23):2873-91. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.097014. Epub 2012 May 14.
6
Meta-analysis of everolimus-eluting versus paclitaxel-eluting stents in coronary artery disease: final 3-year results of the SPIRIT clinical trials program (Clinical Evaluation of the Xience V Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System in the Treatment of Patients With De Novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions).在冠状动脉疾病中,依维莫司洗脱支架与紫杉醇洗脱支架的荟萃分析:SPIRIT 临床试验计划的最终 3 年结果(在治疗新发病变的患者中,使用依维莫司洗脱冠状动脉支架系统治疗的西里斯 V 依维莫司洗脱冠状动脉支架系统的临床评估)。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Sep;6(9):914-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.05.005.
7
Randomized comparison of everolimus-eluting and paclitaxel-eluting stents: two-year clinical follow-up from the Clinical Evaluation of the Xience V Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System in the Treatment of Patients with de novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions (SPIRIT) III trial.依维莫司洗脱支架与紫杉醇洗脱支架的随机对照比较:来自Xience V依维莫司洗脱冠状动脉支架系统治疗初发原发性冠状动脉病变患者的临床评估(SPIRIT)III试验的两年临床随访
Circulation. 2009 Feb 10;119(5):680-6. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.803528. Epub 2009 Jan 26.
8
3-year follow-up of the SISR (Sirolimus-Eluting Stents Versus Vascular Brachytherapy for In-Stent Restenosis) trial.西罗莫司洗脱支架与血管内近距离放射治疗治疗支架内再狭窄(SISR)试验的3年随访
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2008 Aug;1(4):439-48. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2008.05.010.
9
5-year results of a randomized comparison of XIENCE V everolimus-eluting and TAXUS paclitaxel-eluting stents: final results from the SPIRIT III trial (clinical evaluation of the XIENCE V everolimus eluting coronary stent system in the treatment of patients with de novo native coronary artery lesions).SPIRIT III 试验的 5 年随机对照研究结果:依维莫司洗脱 XIENCE V 支架与紫杉醇洗脱 Taxus 支架的比较——治疗初发的 native 冠状动脉病变患者的 XIENCE V 依维莫司洗脱冠状动脉支架系统的临床评估。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Dec;6(12):1263-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.07.009. Epub 2013 Nov 13.
10
Comparison of an everolimus-eluting stent and a paclitaxel-eluting stent in patients with coronary artery disease: a randomized trial.依维莫司洗脱支架与紫杉醇洗脱支架治疗冠状动脉疾病患者的比较:一项随机试验。
JAMA. 2008 Apr 23;299(16):1903-13. doi: 10.1001/jama.299.16.1903.

引用本文的文献

1
Endothelial Progenitor Cells for Ischemic Stroke: Update on Basic Research and Application.用于缺血性中风的内皮祖细胞:基础研究与应用的最新进展
Stem Cells Int. 2017;2017:2193432. doi: 10.1155/2017/2193432. Epub 2017 Aug 16.
2
The relationship between the number of preprocedural circulating endothelial progenitor cells and angiographic restenosis following coronary artery stent placement.冠状动脉支架置入术前循环内皮祖细胞数量与血管造影再狭窄之间的关系。
Heart Asia. 2011 Jan 1;3(1):60-5. doi: 10.1136/ha.2010.003079. eCollection 2011.
3
Restenosis after PCI. Part 2: prevention and therapy.
经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后的再狭窄。第 2 部分:预防和治疗。
Nat Rev Cardiol. 2011 Oct 11;9(2):79-90. doi: 10.1038/nrcardio.2011.148.
4
Applying the National Institute for Clinical Excellence criteria to patients treated with the Genous™ Bio-engineered R stent™: a sub-study of the e-HEALING (Healthy Endothelial Accelerated Lining Inhibits Neointimal Growth) worldwide registry.将英国国家临床优化研究所的标准应用于接受Genous™生物工程R支架™治疗的患者:e-HEALING(健康内皮加速内膜抑制新生内膜生长)全球注册研究的一项子研究。
Heart Vessels. 2012 Jul;27(4):360-9. doi: 10.1007/s00380-011-0167-8. Epub 2011 Jul 2.
5
Endothelial progenitor cells: what use for the cardiologist?内皮祖细胞:心脏病专家有何用?
J Angiogenes Res. 2010 Feb 22;2:6. doi: 10.1186/2040-2384-2-6.