Department of Chemical & Biological Engineering, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309, USA.
Dent Mater. 2010 Jan;26(1):21-8. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2009.08.004.
The objective of this work was to evaluate thiol-norbornene and thiol-ene-methacrylate systems as the resin phase of dental restorative materials and demonstrate their superior performance as compared to dimethacrylate materials.
Polymerization kinetics and overall functional group conversions were determined by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR). Flexural strength and modulus were determined with a 3-point flexural test. Polymerization-induced shrinkage stress was measured with a tensometer.
Thiol-ene polymer systems were demonstrated to exhibit advantageous properties for dental restorative materials in regards to rapid curing kinetics, high conversion, and low shrinkage and stress. However, both the thiol-norbornene and thiol-allyl ether systems studied here exhibit significant reductions in flexural strength and modulus relative to BisGMA/TEGDMA. By utilizing the thiol-ene component as the reactive diluent in dimethacrylate systems, high flexural modulus and strength are achieved while dramatically reducing the polymerization shrinkage stress. The methacrylate-thiol-allyl ether and methacrylate-thiol-norbornene systems both exhibited equivalent flexural modulus (2.1+/-0.1 GPa) and slightly reduced flexural strength (95+/-1 and 101+/-3 MPa, respectively) relative to BisGMA/TEGDMA (flexural modulus; 2.2+0.1 GPa and flexural strength; 112+/-3 MPa). Both the methacrylate-thiol-allyl ether and methacrylate-thiol-norbornene systems exhibited dramatic reductions in shrinkage stress (1.1+/-0.1 and 1.1+/-0.2 MPa, respectively) relative to BisGMA/TEGDMA (2.6+/-0.2 MPa).
The improved polymerization kinetics and overall functional group conversion, coupled with reductions in shrinkage stress while maintaining equivalent flexural modulus, result in a superior overall dental restorative material as compared to traditional bulk dimethacrylate resins.
本研究旨在评估硫醇-降冰片烯和硫醇-烯-甲基丙烯酸酯体系作为牙科修复材料的树脂相,并证明与二甲基丙烯酸酯材料相比,其具有优异的性能。
通过傅里叶变换红外光谱(FTIR)测定聚合动力学和总官能团转化率。用三点弯曲试验测定弯曲强度和模量。用张力计测量聚合收缩应力。
硫醇-烯聚合物体系在牙科修复材料方面表现出快速固化动力学、高转化率、低收缩和低应力的优势。然而,研究中的硫醇-降冰片烯和硫醇-烯基醚体系的弯曲强度和模量均显著低于 BisGMA/TEGDMA。通过将硫醇-烯组分用作二甲基丙烯酸酯体系中的反应性稀释剂,可以在显著降低聚合收缩应力的同时获得高弯曲模量和强度。甲基丙烯酸酯-硫醇-烯基醚和甲基丙烯酸酯-硫醇-降冰片烯体系的弯曲模量(2.1+/-0.1 GPa)和弯曲强度(分别为 95+/-1 和 101+/-3 MPa)与 BisGMA/TEGDMA 相当(弯曲模量;2.2+0.1 GPa,弯曲强度;112+/-3 MPa)。甲基丙烯酸酯-硫醇-烯基醚和甲基丙烯酸酯-硫醇-降冰片烯体系的收缩应力(分别为 1.1+/-0.1 和 1.1+/-0.2 MPa)均显著低于 BisGMA/TEGDMA(2.6+/-0.2 MPa)。
改进的聚合动力学和总官能团转化率,结合收缩应力的降低,同时保持等效的弯曲模量,与传统的块状二甲基丙烯酸酯树脂相比,可获得一种性能更优异的整体牙科修复材料。