Hofmeyr G Justus, Gülmezoglu A Metin, Novikova Natalia, Linder Verena, Ferreira Sandra, Piaggio Gilda
East London Hospital Complex and University of the Witwatersrand, East London, South Africa.
Bull World Health Organ. 2009 Sep;87(9):666-77. doi: 10.2471/blt.08.055715.
To review maternal deaths and the dose-related effects of misoprostol on blood loss and pyrexia in randomized trials of misoprostol use for the prevention or treatment of postpartum haemorrhage.
We searched the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register and Pubmed, without language restrictions, for '(misoprostol AND postpartum) OR (misoprostol AND haemorrhage) OR (misoprostol AND hemorrhage)', and we evaluated reports identified through the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group search strategy. Randomized trials comparing misoprostol with either placebo or another uterotonic to prevent or treat postpartum haemorrhage were checked for eligibility. Data were extracted, tabulated and analysed with Reviewer Manager (RevMan) 4.3 software.
We included 46 trials with more than 40,000 participants in the final analysis. Of 11 deaths reported in 5 trials, 8 occurred in women receiving >or= 600 microg of misoprostol (Peto odds ratio, OR: 2.49; 95% confidence interval, CI: 0.76-8.13). Severe morbidity, defined as the need for major surgery, admission to intensive care, organ failure or body temperature >or= 40 degrees C, was relatively infrequent. In prevention trials, severe morbidity was experienced by 16 of 10,281 women on misoprostol and by 16 of 10,292 women on conventional uterotonics; in treatment trials, it was experienced by 1 of 32 women on misoprostol and by 1 of 32 women on conventional uterotonics. Misoprostol recipients experienced more adverse events than placebo recipients: 8 of 2070 versus 5 of 2032, respectively, in prevention trials, and 5 of 196 versus 2 of 202, respectively, in treatment trials. Meta-analysis of direct and adjusted indirect comparisons of the results of randomized trials showed no evidence that 600 microg are more effective than 400 microg for preventing blood loss > 1000 ml (relative risk, RR: 1.02; 95% CI: 0.71-1.48). Pyrexia was more than twice as common among women who received > 600 microg rather than 400 microg of misoprostol (RR: 2.53; 95% CI: 1.78-3.60).
Further research is needed to more accurately assess the potential beneficial and harmful effects of misoprostol and to determine the smallest dose that is effective and safe. In this review, 400 microg of misoprostol were found to be safer than > 600 microg and just as effective.
在米索前列醇用于预防或治疗产后出血的随机试验中,回顾孕产妇死亡情况以及米索前列醇与失血和发热的剂量相关效应。
我们在无语言限制的情况下,检索Cochrane对照试验注册库和PubMed,检索词为“(米索前列醇 AND 产后) OR (米索前列醇 AND 出血) OR (米索前列醇 AND hemorrhage)”,并评估通过Cochrane妊娠与分娩组检索策略识别出的报告。对比较米索前列醇与安慰剂或其他宫缩剂预防或治疗产后出血的随机试验进行资格审查。使用Reviewer Manager (RevMan) 4.3软件提取数据、列表并进行分析。
我们将46项试验纳入最终分析,参与试验者超过40,000人。在5项试验报告的11例死亡中,8例发生在接受≥600微克米索前列醇的女性中(Peto比值比,OR:2.49;95%置信区间,CI:0.76 - 8.13)。严重并发症定义为需要进行大手术、入住重症监护病房、器官衰竭或体温≥40摄氏度,相对较少见。在预防试验中,10,281名使用米索前列醇的女性中有16例出现严重并发症,10,292名使用传统宫缩剂的女性中有16例出现;在治疗试验中,32名使用米索前列醇的女性中有1例出现,32名使用传统宫缩剂的女性中有1例出现。使用米索前列醇的受试者比使用安慰剂的受试者经历更多不良事件:在预防试验中分别为2070例中的8例和2032例中的5例,在治疗试验中分别为196例中的5例和202例中的2例。对随机试验结果的直接和调整后的间接比较进行荟萃分析,没有证据表明600微克在预防失血>1000毫升方面比400微克更有效(相对风险,RR:1.02;95% CI:0.71 - 1.48)。接受>600微克而非400微克米索前列醇的女性发热的发生率是前者的两倍多(RR:2.53;95% CI:1.78 - 3.60)。
需要进一步研究以更准确地评估米索前列醇的潜在有益和有害影响,并确定有效且安全的最小剂量。在本综述中,发现400微克米索前列醇比>600微克更安全且效果相同。