• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

动物模型中虚拟亲本组的模糊分类

Fuzzy classification of phantom parent groups in an animal model.

作者信息

Fikse Freddy

机构信息

Department of Animal Breeding and Genetics, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, 75007 Uppsala, Sweden.

出版信息

Genet Sel Evol. 2009 Sep 28;41(1):42. doi: 10.1186/1297-9686-41-42.

DOI:10.1186/1297-9686-41-42
PMID:19785735
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2762463/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Genetic evaluation models often include genetic groups to account for unequal genetic level of animals with unknown parentage. The definition of phantom parent groups usually includes a time component (e.g. years). Combining several time periods to ensure sufficiently large groups may create problems since all phantom parents in a group are considered contemporaries.

METHODS

To avoid the downside of such distinct classification, a fuzzy logic approach is suggested. A phantom parent can be assigned to several genetic groups, with proportions between zero and one that sum to one. Rules were presented for assigning coefficients to the inverse of the relationship matrix for fuzzy-classified genetic groups. This approach was illustrated with simulated data from ten generations of mass selection. Observations and pedigree records were randomly deleted. Phantom parent groups were defined on the basis of gender and generation number. In one scenario, uncertainty about generation of birth was simulated for some animals with unknown parents. In the distinct classification, one of the two possible generations of birth was randomly chosen to assign phantom parents to genetic groups for animals with simulated uncertainty, whereas the phantom parents were assigned to both possible genetic groups in the fuzzy classification.

RESULTS

The empirical prediction error variance (PEV) was somewhat lower for fuzzy-classified genetic groups. The ranking of animals with unknown parents was more correct and less variable across replicates in comparison with distinct genetic groups. In another scenario, each phantom parent was assigned to three groups, one pertaining to its gender, and two pertaining to the first and last generation, with proportion depending on the (true) generation of birth. Due to the lower number of groups, the empirical PEV of breeding values was smaller when genetic groups were fuzzy-classified.

CONCLUSION

Fuzzy-classification provides the potential to describe the genetic level of unknown parents in a more parsimonious and structured manner, and thereby increases the precision of predicted breeding values.

摘要

背景

遗传评估模型通常包含遗传群体,以考虑无系谱记录动物的不同遗传水平。虚拟亲本群体的定义通常包含一个时间成分(如年份)。将多个时间段合并以确保群体足够大可能会产生问题,因为一个群体中的所有虚拟亲本都被视为同代个体。

方法

为避免这种明确分类的弊端,建议采用模糊逻辑方法。一个虚拟亲本可以被分配到几个遗传群体中,比例在0到1之间且总和为1。给出了为模糊分类的遗传群体的关系矩阵的逆矩阵分配系数的规则。用十代群体选择的模拟数据说明了这种方法。随机删除观测值和系谱记录。根据性别和世代数定义虚拟亲本群体。在一种情况下,对一些无系谱记录的动物模拟出生世代的不确定性。在明确分类中,对于有模拟不确定性的动物,随机选择两个可能的出生世代之一将虚拟亲本分配到遗传群体中,而在模糊分类中,虚拟亲本被分配到两个可能的遗传群体中。

结果

模糊分类的遗传群体的经验预测误差方差(PEV)略低。与明确的遗传群体相比,无系谱记录动物的排名在各重复中更准确且变异性更小。在另一种情况下,每个虚拟亲本被分配到三个群体,一个与其性别相关,另外两个与第一代和最后一代相关,比例取决于(真实的)出生世代。由于群体数量较少,当遗传群体进行模糊分类时,育种值的经验PEV较小。

结论

模糊分类提供了以更简约和结构化的方式描述无系谱记录亲本遗传水平的潜力,从而提高了预测育种值的精度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/770f/2762463/228444e8598a/1297-9686-41-42-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/770f/2762463/b871d1d586ad/1297-9686-41-42-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/770f/2762463/228444e8598a/1297-9686-41-42-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/770f/2762463/b871d1d586ad/1297-9686-41-42-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/770f/2762463/228444e8598a/1297-9686-41-42-2.jpg

相似文献

1
Fuzzy classification of phantom parent groups in an animal model.动物模型中虚拟亲本组的模糊分类
Genet Sel Evol. 2009 Sep 28;41(1):42. doi: 10.1186/1297-9686-41-42.
2
Modeling pedigree accuracy and uncertain parentage in single-step genomic evaluations of simulated and US Holstein datasets.模拟和美国荷斯坦数据集的一步基因组评估中系谱准确性和不确定亲缘关系的建模。
J Dairy Sci. 2019 Mar;102(3):2308-2318. doi: 10.3168/jds.2018-15419. Epub 2019 Jan 11.
3
Controlling bias in genomic breeding values for young genotyped bulls.控制年轻基因型公牛基因组育种值中的偏差。
J Dairy Sci. 2019 Nov;102(11):9956-9970. doi: 10.3168/jds.2019-16789. Epub 2019 Sep 5.
4
MRI definition of target volumes using fuzzy logic method for three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2003 Jan 1;55(1):225-33. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(02)03829-4.
5
Accounting for genetic differences among unknown parents in microevolutionary studies: how to include genetic groups in quantitative genetic animal models.在微观进化研究中考虑未知亲本之间的遗传差异:如何在数量遗传动物模型中纳入遗传群体。
J Anim Ecol. 2017 Jan;86(1):7-20. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.12597. Epub 2016 Nov 3.
6
Optimised parent selection and minimum inbreeding mating in small aquaculture breeding schemes: a simulation study.优化亲鱼选择和最小近交交配在小规模水产养殖繁育计划中:一项模拟研究。
Animal. 2013 Jan;7(1):1-10. doi: 10.1017/S1751731112001371. Epub 2012 Jul 6.
7
Genomic prediction ability for beef fatty acid profile in Nelore cattle using different pseudo-phenotypes.使用不同伪表型对内洛尔牛牛肉脂肪酸谱的基因组预测能力。
J Appl Genet. 2018 Nov;59(4):493-501. doi: 10.1007/s13353-018-0470-5. Epub 2018 Sep 24.
8
Genetic evaluation with uncertain parentage: a comparison of methods.有不确定亲缘关系的遗传评估:方法比较。
Theor Appl Genet. 1992 Jun;84(1-2):173-9. doi: 10.1007/BF00223997.
9
Reliability of pedigree-based and genomic evaluations in selected populations.选定群体中基于系谱和基因组评估的可靠性。
Genet Sel Evol. 2015 Aug 14;47(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s12711-015-0145-1.
10
Single step genomic evaluation for female fertility in Nordic Red dairy cattle.北欧红牛雌性生育力的单步基因组评估
J Anim Breed Genet. 2018 Oct;135(5):337-348. doi: 10.1111/jbg.12353. Epub 2018 Aug 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Definition of metafounders based on population structure analysis.基于群体结构分析的元发现者定义。
Genet Sel Evol. 2024 Jun 6;56(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s12711-024-00913-7.
2
Accounting for genetic differences among unknown parents in microevolutionary studies: how to include genetic groups in quantitative genetic animal models.在微观进化研究中考虑未知亲本之间的遗传差异:如何在数量遗传动物模型中纳入遗传群体。
J Anim Ecol. 2017 Jan;86(1):7-20. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.12597. Epub 2016 Nov 3.

本文引用的文献

1
Genetic evaluation with uncertain parentage: a comparison of methods.有不确定亲缘关系的遗传评估:方法比较。
Theor Appl Genet. 1992 Jun;84(1-2):173-9. doi: 10.1007/BF00223997.
2
Should genetic groups be fitted in BLUP evaluation? Practical answer for the French AI beef sire evaluation.遗传群体是否应纳入最佳线性无偏预测(BLUP)评估?法国人工智能肉牛种公牛评估的实际答案。
Genet Sel Evol. 2004 May-Jun;36(3):325-45. doi: 10.1186/1297-9686-36-3-325.
3
Simple and rapid inversion of additive relationship matrices incorporating parental uncertainty.
J Anim Sci. 1992 Apr;70(4):1045-8. doi: 10.2527/1992.7041045x.