Institut Jean-Nicod EHESS-ENS-CNRS, Transitions NYU-CNRS, New York, NY 10003, USA.
Neuropsychologia. 2010 Feb;48(3):669-80. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.09.022. Epub 2009 Sep 26.
There seems to be no dimension of bodily awareness that cannot be disrupted. To account for such variety, there is a growing consensus that there are at least two distinct types of body representation that can be impaired, the body schema and the body image. However, the definition of these notions is often unclear. The notion of body image has attracted most controversy because of its lack of unifying positive definition. The notion of body schema, onto which there seems to be a more widespread agreement, also covers a variety of sensorimotor representations. Here, I provide a conceptual analysis of the body schema contrasting it with the body image(s) as well as assess whether (i) the body schema can be specifically impaired, while other types of body representation are preserved; and (ii) the body schema obeys principles that are different from those that apply to other types of body representation.
似乎没有哪个身体意识维度不能被扰乱。为了说明这种多样性,越来越多的人达成共识,认为至少有两种不同类型的身体表象可能受到损害,即身体图式和身体意象。然而,这些概念的定义往往不够清晰。身体意象的概念引起了最多的争议,因为它缺乏统一的正面定义。身体图式的概念似乎得到了更广泛的认同,但它也涵盖了各种感觉运动表象。在这里,我对身体图式进行了概念分析,将其与身体意象进行了对比,并评估了以下两种情况:(i)身体图式是否可以特异性受损,而其他类型的身体表象得以保留;以及(ii)身体图式是否遵循与适用于其他类型身体表象的原则不同的原则。