RM Alden Research Laboratory, Santa Monica, California 90404, USA.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2009 Dec;53(12):5122-6. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00064-09. Epub 2009 Sep 28.
After ertapenem was added to the formulary of a 344-bed community teaching hospital, we retrospectively studied its effect on antimicrobial utilization and on the in vitro susceptibility of various antimicrobial agents against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Three study periods were defined as preintroduction (months 1 to 9), postintroduction but before the autosubstitution of ertapenem for ampicillin-sulbactam (months 10 to 18), and after the policy of autosubstitution (months 19 to 48) was initiated. Ertapenem usage rose slowly from introduction to a range of 36 to 48 defined daily doses/1,000 patient days (DDD) with a resultant decrease in ampicillin-sulbactam usage due to autosubstitution. Imipenem usage peaked 6 months after the introduction of ertapenem and started to decline coincidently with the increased use of ertapenem. During the second period, imipenem usage decreased (slope = -1.28; P = 0.002). Prior to the introduction of ertapenem, the susceptibility of P. aeruginosa to imipenem increased from 61 to 81% at month 7 but then decreased slightly to 67% at month 9. After the introduction of ertapenem, susceptibility continued to increase; the increasing trend was significant (slope = 1.74; P < 0.001). In the third period, the median susceptibility (interquartile range) was 88% (82 to 95%). This change appeared related to decreased imipenem usage. For every unit decrease in the monthly DDD of imipenem, there was an increase of 0.38% (P = 0.008) in the susceptibility of P. aeruginosa to imipenem in the same month. Ertapenem was effective in our antimicrobial stewardship program and may have helped improve the P. aeruginosa antimicrobial susceptibility to imipenem by decreasing the unnecessary usage and selective pressure of antipseudomonal agents.
厄他培南被纳入一家 344 床社区教学医院的处方集后,我们回顾性地研究了它对抗菌药物利用的影响,以及对铜绿假单胞菌各种抗菌药物体外敏感性的影响。我们定义了三个研究期:引入前(第 1 至 9 个月)、引入后但在厄他培南自动替代氨苄西林-舒巴坦之前(第 10 至 18 个月)以及在启动自动替代政策(第 19 至 48 个月)之后。厄他培南的使用量从引入时的 36 至 48 个限定日剂量/1000 患者日(DDD)缓慢上升,由于自动替代,氨苄西林-舒巴坦的使用量下降。在引入厄他培南 6 个月后,亚胺培南的使用量达到峰值,并且随着厄他培南使用量的增加而开始下降。在第二个时期,亚胺培南的使用量减少(斜率=-1.28;P=0.002)。在引入厄他培南之前,铜绿假单胞菌对亚胺培南的敏感性从第 7 个月的 61%增加到 81%,但随后略有下降到第 9 个月的 67%。在引入厄他培南后,敏感性继续增加;这种增加趋势是显著的(斜率=1.74;P<0.001)。在第三个时期,中位敏感性(四分位间距)为 88%(82%至 95%)。这种变化似乎与亚胺培南使用量的减少有关。亚胺培南每月 DDD 减少一个单位,铜绿假单胞菌对亚胺培南的敏感性当月增加 0.38%(P=0.008)。厄他培南在我们的抗菌药物管理计划中是有效的,并且可能通过减少抗假单胞菌药物的不必要使用和选择压力,有助于提高铜绿假单胞菌对亚胺培南的药敏性。