• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

抗溃疡治疗:处方管理实践。

Antiulcer therapy: an exercise in formulary management.

作者信息

Foulke G E, Siepler J

机构信息

Division of Pulmonary/Critical Care Medicine, University of California Davis Medical Center, Sacramento.

出版信息

J Clin Gastroenterol. 1990;12 Suppl 2:S64-8.

PMID:1978846
Abstract

The purpose of formulary management is to contain costs while preserving quality care. A pharmacy cost review can identify key areas where limiting the agents used could lower costs. H2-receptor antagonists represent such agents. At UC Davis Medical Center, H2-receptor antagonists were found to be one of the highest-cost drug groups in the hospital. Seventy percent of H2-receptor antagonist use was for intravenous prophylaxis of stress ulcer. After a committee review of available data, H2-receptor antagonists were considered therapeutically equivalent. Cimetidine was chosen as the primary H2-receptor antagonist because of an estimated 36% cost savings. Inpatient H2-receptor antagonist use changed from 90% ranitidine prior to the decision to 90% cimetidine after the decision. A monitoring program revealed that there were similar numbers of elevated drug levels for theophylline, phenytoin, and lidocaine before and after the programmatic change. There was no difference in numbers of patients with theophylline toxicity on cimetidine or ranitidine. The incidence of bleeding from stress ulcer was 1.4% in the year following the change to cimetidine use. With aggressive review and utilization of scientific data, cost-saving H2-receptor antagonist restriction decisions can be made that do not compromise quality care.

摘要

处方集管理的目的是在保证医疗质量的同时控制成本。药房成本审查可以确定限制使用某些药物可降低成本的关键领域。H2受体拮抗剂就是这类药物。在加州大学戴维斯分校医疗中心,H2受体拮抗剂被发现是医院中成本最高的药物类别之一。70%的H2受体拮抗剂用于静脉预防应激性溃疡。在委员会对现有数据进行审查后,H2受体拮抗剂被认为在治疗上等效。由于预计可节省36%的成本,西咪替丁被选为主要的H2受体拮抗剂。住院患者使用H2受体拮抗剂的情况从决定前90%使用雷尼替丁变为决定后90%使用西咪替丁。一项监测计划显示,在方案变更前后,茶碱、苯妥英和利多卡因的药物水平升高的数量相似。使用西咪替丁或雷尼替丁的患者中,茶碱中毒的人数没有差异。改用西咪替丁后的一年中,应激性溃疡出血的发生率为1.4%。通过积极审查和利用科学数据,可以做出节省成本的H2受体拮抗剂限制决定,而不会影响医疗质量。

相似文献

1
Antiulcer therapy: an exercise in formulary management.抗溃疡治疗:处方管理实践。
J Clin Gastroenterol. 1990;12 Suppl 2:S64-8.
2
Reducing costs with formulary limitation of H2-receptor antagonists in a community hospital.通过在社区医院限制使用H2受体拮抗剂来降低成本
Hosp Pharm. 1991 Feb;26(2):126-9, 142.
3
Experience with a two-tiered therapeutic interchange policy.两层治疗性换药政策的经验
Am J Hosp Pharm. 1989 Sep;46(9):1792-8.
4
Formulary designation of cimetidine as the primary intravenous histamine H2-receptor antagonist.将西咪替丁指定为主要的静脉注射组胺H2受体拮抗剂的处方集指定。
Am J Hosp Pharm. 1992 Jan;49(1):134-5.
5
Rational selection of H2-receptor antagonists for the hospital formulary. Roundtable discussion.医院处方集H2受体拮抗剂的合理选择。圆桌讨论。
Hosp Formul. 1991 Nov;26 Suppl D:13-9.
6
A practice-based approach for converting from proton pump inhibitors to less costly therapy.一种基于实践的从质子泵抑制剂转换为成本较低治疗方法的途径。
Eff Clin Pract. 2001 Nov-Dec;4(6):263-70.
7
Clinical appropriateness, therapeutic equivalence, and cost of conversion of H2 antagonist therapy.H2拮抗剂治疗的临床适宜性、治疗等效性及转换成本
Hosp Formul. 1993 Jan;28(1):86-8, 91, 95-6.
8
Retrospective analysis of formulary restriction demonstrates significant cost savings.对处方集限制的回顾性分析表明成本显著节约。
Hosp Formul. 1991 Nov;26 Suppl D:30-2.
9
Criteria-based DUE aids in selection of preferred agent.
Hosp Formul. 1991 Nov;26 Suppl D:25-7.
10
Decision analysis applied to selection of histamine H2-receptor antagonists for the formulary.应用于选择组胺H2受体拮抗剂列入处方集的决策分析。
Am J Hosp Pharm. 1990 Sep;47(9):2002-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Variation in Formulary Management Practices Within the Department of Veterans Affairs Health Care System.退伍军人事务部医疗保健系统内处方管理实践的差异。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2016 Feb;22(2):114-20. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2016.14251. Epub 2015 Dec 14.
2
Formulary management of antiulcer drugs: economic considerations.抗溃疡药物的处方集管理:经济考量
Pharmacoeconomics. 1994 Apr;5(4):313-34. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199405040-00006.
3
Institutional formularies: the relevance of pharmacoeconomic analysis to formulary decisions.
机构处方集:药物经济学分析与处方集决策的相关性。
Pharmacoeconomics. 1992 Apr;1(4):265-81. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199201040-00004.