Suppr超能文献

在成年和新生大鼠中遗传标记后,通过反式视黄醇和 2AAF 模型进行直接体内细胞谱系分析在肝损伤中的应用。

Direct in vivo cell lineage analysis in the retrorsine and 2AAF models of liver injury after genetic labeling in adult and newborn rats.

机构信息

INSERM U948, Biothérapies Hépatiques, CHU Hotel Dieu, Nantes, France.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2009 Sep 30;4(9):e7267. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0007267.

Abstract

BACKGROUNDS AND AIMS

When hepatocyte proliferation is impaired, liver regeneration proceeds from the division of non parenchymal hepatocyte progenitors. Oval cells and Small Hepatocyte-like Progenitor Cells (SHPCs) represent the two most studied examples of such epithelial cells with putative stem cell capacity. In the present study we wished to compare the origin of SHPCs proliferating after retrorsine administration to the one of oval cells observed after 2-Acetyl-Amino fluorene (2-AAF) treatment.

METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We used retroviral-mediated nlslacZ genetic labeling of dividing cells to study the fate of cells in the liver. Labeling was performed either in adult rats before treatment or in newborn animals. Labeled cells were identified and characterised by immunohistochemistry. In adult-labeled animals, labeling was restricted to mature hepatocytes. Retrorsine treatment did not modify the overall number of labeled cells in the liver whereas after 2-AAF administration unlabeled oval cells were recorded and the total number of labeled cells decreased significantly. When labeling was performed in newborn rats, results after retrorsine administration were identical to those obtained in adult-labeled rats. In contrast, in the 2-AAF regimen numerous labeled oval cells were present and were able to generate new labeled hepatocytes. Furthermore, we also observed labeled biliary tracts in 2-AAF treated rats.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results strongly suggest that SHPCs are derived from hepatocytes and we confirm that SHPCs and oval cells do not share the same origin. We also show that hepatic progenitors are labeled in newborn rats suggesting future directions for in vivo lineage studies.

摘要

背景与目的

当肝细胞增殖受损时,肝再生则来自非实质细胞肝祖细胞的分裂。卵圆细胞和小肝样祖细胞(SHPC)是此类具有潜在干细胞能力的上皮细胞中研究最多的两个例子。在本研究中,我们希望比较在反式霉素处理后增殖的 SHPC 的起源与在 2-乙酰氨基芴(2-AAF)处理后观察到的卵圆细胞的起源。

方法/主要发现:我们使用逆转录病毒介导的 nlslacZ 遗传标记分裂细胞来研究肝脏中细胞的命运。标记在治疗前的成年大鼠或新生动物中进行。通过免疫组织化学鉴定和表征标记细胞。在成年标记动物中,标记仅限于成熟肝细胞。反式霉素处理不会改变肝脏中标记细胞的总数,而在 2-AAF 给药后则记录到未标记的卵圆细胞,标记细胞的总数显著减少。当在新生大鼠中进行标记时,反式霉素处理后的结果与在成年标记大鼠中获得的结果相同。相比之下,在 2-AAF 方案中,存在大量标记的卵圆细胞,并且能够产生新的标记的肝细胞。此外,我们还观察到在 2-AAF 处理的大鼠中存在标记的胆管。

结论

我们的结果强烈表明 SHPC 来源于肝细胞,并且我们证实 SHPC 和卵圆细胞没有共同的起源。我们还表明,肝祖细胞在新生大鼠中被标记,提示未来进行体内谱系研究的方向。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/999e/2747281/8c4ceb20c288/pone.0007267.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验