Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010 Jul;22(7):808-12. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0b013e3283320113.
The role of heterozygosity for alpha-1 antitrypsin (A1AT) alleles in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) is unclear. There is limited evidence to suggest that there is an increased prevalence of heterozygous A1AT carriers in HCV, but it is unclear how this affects treatment success.
To investigate the (i) prevalence of A1AT heterozygosity among two HCV cohorts and (ii) its effect on treatment outcome.
We performed a retrospective cohort study using two different cohorts. Cohort 1 consisted of 678 German HCV patients, 507 of them were treated for HCV with standard therapy. Cohort 2 consisted of 370 Dutch HCV patients of which 252 were part of a clinical trial (treatment with amantadine or placebo, in combination with pegylated interferon alpha-2b and ribavirin) whereas 37 HCV patients received standard therapy. We analyzed A1AT status using direct sequencing of the A1AT gene (cohort 1) or isoelectric focusing of serum (cohort 2). In addition, we measured A1AT serum levels (cohort 2).
In total, we included 1048 HCV patients; 986 (94%) were wildtype [protease inhibitor (Pi) MM], whereas 61 (6%) were heterozygous for a mutant A1AT allele (41 Pi MS, 20 Pi MZ). Mean A1AT serum levels (370 patients) were lower in A1AT heterozygous patients (1.68 vs. 1.36 g/l), (P<0.05) compared with wildtypes. Sustained viral response (SVR) after treatment was equal between the wildtypes and heterozygotes (54 vs. 56%).
We found a heterozygosity rate of 0.06, in line with healthy controls in other studies. Serum A1AT levels from A1AT heterozygous HCV patients are significantly lower compared with wildtype patients, although they do not discriminate on an individual level. Finally, SVR in A1AT wildtypes was not different from SVR in A1AT heterozygotes.
α-1 抗胰蛋白酶(A1AT)等位基因杂合性在慢性丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)患者中的作用尚不清楚。有有限的证据表明,HCV 中杂合 A1AT 携带者的患病率增加,但尚不清楚这如何影响治疗效果。
研究(i)两个 HCV 队列中 A1AT 杂合性的流行率,以及(ii)其对治疗结果的影响。
我们使用两个不同的队列进行了回顾性队列研究。队列 1 包括 678 名德国 HCV 患者,其中 507 名接受标准疗法治疗 HCV。队列 2 包括 370 名荷兰 HCV 患者,其中 252 名患者参加了一项临床试验(金刚烷胺或安慰剂联合聚乙二醇干扰素α-2b 和利巴韦林治疗),37 名 HCV 患者接受标准疗法。我们使用 A1AT 基因的直接测序(队列 1)或血清等电聚焦(队列 2)分析 A1AT 状态。此外,我们还测量了队列 2 中 A1AT 血清水平。
我们共纳入 1048 名 HCV 患者;986 名(94%)为野生型[蛋白酶抑制剂(Pi)MM],61 名(6%)为突变 A1AT 等位基因的杂合子(41 Pi MS,20 Pi MZ)。杂合子患者(370 名)的 A1AT 血清水平(1.68 比 1.36 g/l)明显低于野生型患者(P<0.05)。野生型和杂合子患者的治疗后持续病毒应答(SVR)率相同(54 比 56%)。
我们发现杂合率为 0.06,与其他研究中的健康对照组一致。与野生型患者相比,A1AT 杂合 HCV 患者的 A1AT 血清水平明显降低,尽管它们在个体水平上不能区分。最后,A1AT 野生型患者的 SVR 与 A1AT 杂合子患者的 SVR 无差异。