Byers Stacey R, Cary Julie A, Farnsworth Kelly D
Washington State University, College of Veterinary Medicine, Veterinary Clinical Sciences, Pullman, WA 99164-7060, USA.
Can Vet J. 2009 Jul;50(7):745-9.
This study evaluated a retrograde orotracheal intubation technique and compared it to the traditional normograde intubation technique used in llamas. Oral anatomical features, which can impair visualization of the epiglottis and laryngeal structures, and the production of excessive salivary secretions make it difficult to establish an airway under emergency conditions. Normograde intubation involves placing a stylet through the mouth into the trachea and advancing the endotracheal tube over the stylet into the trachea. For retrograde intubation, a nested trochar with cannula is placed into the cervical trachea and a stylet is advanced through the cannula and out the mouth. The endotracheal tube is advanced over the stylet back into the trachea. Our evaluation of both techniques found no statistical difference in time to place the stylet or endotracheal tube; however, fewer attempts were needed to place the tube using the retrograde technique. We found the retrograde technique to be a viable option for intubating llamas.
本研究评估了一种逆行经口气管插管技术,并将其与用于美洲驼的传统顺行插管技术进行了比较。口腔解剖结构会妨碍会厌和喉部结构的可视化,且会产生过多唾液分泌物,这使得在紧急情况下建立气道变得困难。顺行插管是将一根管芯经口腔插入气管,然后将气管导管沿管芯推进气管。对于逆行插管,将带有套管的套针置入颈段气管,将管芯经套管推进并从口腔穿出。气管导管沿管芯退回气管。我们对这两种技术的评估发现,放置管芯或气管导管的时间没有统计学差异;然而,使用逆行技术放置导管所需的尝试次数更少。我们发现逆行技术是给美洲驼插管的一种可行选择。