Suppr超能文献

3至36个月大儿童颞动脉测温法的评估

Evaluation of temporal artery thermometry in children 3-36 months old.

作者信息

Holzhauer Janet K, Reith Vicky, Sawin Kathleen J, Yen Kenneth

机构信息

Children's Hospital of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.

出版信息

J Spec Pediatr Nurs. 2009 Oct;14(4):239-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6155.2009.00204.x.

Abstract

PURPOSE

This study aims to determine whether temporal artery (TA) thermometer readings are accurate and better tolerated than rectal readings in young children.

DESIGN AND METHODS

Paired rectal and TA temperature readings and Face Legs Activity Cry and Consolability (FLACC) scores were obtained.

RESULTS

TA thermometry failed to detect rectal fever (38 degrees C or greater) in approximately 20% of paired temperature readings. FLACC scores were significantly lower after TA readings than after rectal readings.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

This study questions TA readings as an accurate substitute for rectal thermometry.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在确定在幼儿中,颞动脉(TA)体温计读数是否准确,以及是否比直肠读数更易被接受。

设计与方法

获取配对的直肠和TA温度读数以及面部腿部活动哭闹和安慰度(FLACC)评分。

结果

在大约20%的配对温度读数中,TA体温计未能检测出直肠发热(38摄氏度或更高)。TA读数后的FLACC评分显著低于直肠读数后的评分。

实践意义

本研究对TA读数能否准确替代直肠体温测量提出了质疑。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验