Dunbar Sandra B, Langberg Jonathan J, Reilly Carolyn M, Viswanathan Bindu, McCarty Frances, Culler Steven D, O'Brien Marian C, Weintraub William S
Nell Hodgson Woodruff School of Nursing, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia 30022, USA.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2009 Oct;32(10):1259-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2009.02495.x.
Psychological responses have been reported for some patients after the insertion of an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD). This study tested the effects of a psychoeducational intervention on anxiety, depressive symptoms, functional status, and health resource use during the first year after ICD implantation.
ICD patients (n = 246) were randomized to usual care (UC), group (GRP), or telephone counseling (TC) intervention that included education, symptom management, and coping skill training. Participants were 58 +/- 11 years, 73% men, and 23% minorities. Anxiety (State-Trait Anxiety Inventory [STAI]), depressive symptoms (Beck Depression Inventory II [BDI-II]), and functional status (Duke Activity Status Inventory [DASI]) were measured at baseline and after 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. Health resource use and disability days were tracked. Analyses were repeated-measures analysis of covariance to assess Group x Time effects,chi(2)for percentage with clinically significant anxiety and depression at each time point, and logistic regression.
All groups experienced decreased anxiety and depressive symptoms over the 12 months; GRP intervention had lower STAI (P = 0.03) than UC at 3 months. Logistic regression revealed group differences for predicted probability of having depressive symptoms at 12 months (UC = 0.31, GRP = 0.17, TC = 0.13, P = 0.03). UC had greater calls to providers at 1 and 6 months (P < 0.05) and more sick/disability days at 12 months (P = 0.01) than intervention groups.
A psychoeducational intervention reduced anxiety and depressive symptoms early after ICD implant, lowered probability of depressive symptoms at 1 year, and decreased disability days/calls to providers. These findings support further study and clinical use of both group and telephone interventions to yield better psychological outcomes after ICD implant.
已有报道称,一些患者在植入植入式心脏复律除颤器(ICD)后会出现心理反应。本研究测试了心理教育干预对ICD植入后第一年的焦虑、抑郁症状、功能状态和卫生资源利用的影响。
将ICD患者(n = 246)随机分为常规护理(UC)组、小组干预(GRP)组或电话咨询(TC)组,干预内容包括教育、症状管理和应对技能培训。参与者年龄为58±11岁,男性占73%,少数族裔占23%。在基线以及1、3、6和12个月后测量焦虑(状态-特质焦虑量表[STAI])、抑郁症状(贝克抑郁量表第二版[BDI-II])和功能状态(杜克活动状态量表[DASI])。跟踪卫生资源利用情况和残疾天数。分析采用重复测量协方差分析以评估组×时间效应,采用卡方检验分析各时间点具有临床显著焦虑和抑郁的百分比,并进行逻辑回归分析。
在12个月内,所有组的焦虑和抑郁症状均有所减轻;在3个月时,GRP干预组的STAI得分低于UC组(P = 0.03)。逻辑回归分析显示,在12个月时出现抑郁症状的预测概率存在组间差异(UC = 0.31,GRP = 0.17,TC = 0.13,P = 0.03)。与干预组相比,UC组在1个月和6个月时致电医疗服务提供者的次数更多(P < 0.05),在12个月时的病假/残疾天数更多(P = 0.01)。
心理教育干预可在ICD植入后早期减轻焦虑和抑郁症状,降低1年时出现抑郁症状的概率,并减少残疾天数/致电医疗服务提供者的次数。这些发现支持进一步研究并在临床中应用小组干预和电话干预,以在ICD植入后取得更好的心理结局。