Program in Nutrition, Department of Health and Behavior Studies, Teachers College, Columbia University, New York, New York 10027, USA.
J Ren Nutr. 2010 Jan;20(1):8.e1-8.e16. doi: 10.1053/j.jrn.2009.06.019. Epub 2009 Sep 30.
Little is known about either the current practices of dietitians in hemodialysis (HD) centers or the practice guidelines that dietitians themselves would like to see developed or revised. This study sought to (1) describe a broad range of nutrition practices among renal dietitians working with adults receiving maintenance HD therapy throughout the United States; (2) determine the extent to which these practices are consistent with professionally accepted guidelines, references, and resources; and (3) ascertain areas in renal nutrition for which dietitians might like the clinical practice guidelines developed or revised.
This was a cross-sectional study conducted by postal mail.
A survey was mailed to all domestic members of the Council on Renal Nutrition of the National Kidney Foundation (n=1270). All respondents who identified themselves as renal dietitians working with adult maintenance HD patients in dialysis centers were included in the study.
The survey queried dietitians regarding a broad range of nutrition practices, including healthy body weight, adjusted body weight, energy requirements, clinical nutrition indicators, metabolic parameters, fluid management, serum potassium, and vitamin supplementation. Dietitians were also asked which guidelines, if any, they would like developed or revised.
A response rate of 68.3% was obtained. The results suggest that (1) there is substantial disparity between renal dietitians' practices and Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative nutrition guidelines in several areas, e.g., the guidelines on weight and on energy requirements; (2) dietitians' reported practices are congruent with Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative guidelines regarding metabolic parameters (e.g., diabetes); and (3) there is substantial variability among dietitians in several areas of practice, including determination of interdialytic weight gain goals. The majority of dietitians agreed that new guidelines need to be developed for interdialytic weight gain (64%) and for vitamin supplementation (80%). Among those who indicated that current guidelines need to be revised (n=333), 25% specified guidelines related to weight, and 23% specified guidelines related to energy requirements.
This study highlights many areas in need of further research, and identifies areas in which renal dietitians would like practice guidelines developed or revised. As such, it may have implications for organizations such as the Kidney Foundation and the American Dietetic Association in their efforts to promote consistent, evidence-based practices among dietitians.
对于目前在血液透析(HD)中心工作的营养师的实践情况,以及营养师自身希望制定或修订的实践指南,我们知之甚少。本研究旨在:(1)描述美国各地为接受维持性 HD 治疗的成年患者提供服务的肾脏营养师的广泛营养实践;(2)确定这些实践与专业认可的指南、参考文献和资源的一致性程度;(3)确定营养师可能希望制定或修订临床实践指南的肾脏营养领域。
这是一项通过邮寄进行的横断面研究。
向全国肾脏基金会(National Kidney Foundation)肾脏营养理事会的所有国内成员(n=1270)邮寄了一份调查。所有自认为是在透析中心为成年维持性 HD 患者工作的肾脏营养师的人都被纳入了研究。
该调查询问了营养师在广泛的营养实践方面的情况,包括健康体重、调整体重、能量需求、临床营养指标、代谢参数、液体管理、血清钾和维生素补充。营养师还被问到他们希望制定或修订哪些指南。
我们获得了 68.3%的回复率。结果表明:(1)在几个领域,肾脏营养师的实践与肾脏病预后质量倡议(Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative)营养指南之间存在很大差异,例如关于体重和能量需求的指南;(2)营养师的报告实践与肾脏病预后质量倡议指南在代谢参数(如糖尿病)方面一致;(3)在几个实践领域,营养师之间存在很大的差异,包括确定间歇性体重增加目标。大多数营养师同意需要为间歇性体重增加(64%)和维生素补充(80%)制定新的指南。在那些表示需要修订当前指南的营养师中(n=333),25%指定了与体重相关的指南,23%指定了与能量需求相关的指南。
本研究强调了许多需要进一步研究的领域,并确定了营养师希望制定或修订实践指南的领域。因此,它可能对肾脏病基金会和美国饮食协会等组织在努力促进营养师之间一致的、基于证据的实践方面产生影响。