Suppr超能文献

经口矫治器治疗阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停的鼻咽镜评估。

Nasopharyngoscopic evaluation of oral appliance therapy for obstructive sleep apnoea.

机构信息

Centre for Sleep Health and Research, Dept of Respiratory Medicine, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, Australia.

出版信息

Eur Respir J. 2010 Apr;35(4):836-42. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00077409. Epub 2009 Sep 24.

Abstract

This study aimed to explore the effect of mandibular advancement splints (MAS) on upper airway anatomy during wakefulness in obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA). Patients commencing treatment for OSA with MAS were recruited. Response to treatment was defined by a >or=50% reduction in the apnoea/hypopnoea index. Nasopharyngoscopy was performed in the supine position. Nasopharyngoscopy was performed in 18 responders and 17 nonresponders. Mandibular advancement caused an increase in the calibre of the velopharynx (mean+/- sem +40+/-10%), with relatively minor changes occurring in the oropharynx and hypopharynx. An increase in cross-sectional area of the velopharynx with mandibular advancement occurred to a greater extent in responders than nonresponders (+56+/-16% versus +22+/-13%; p<0.05). Upper airway collapse during the Müller manoeuvre, relative to the baseline cross-sectional area, was greater in nonresponders than responders in the velopharynx (-94+/-4% versus -69+/-9%; p<0.01) and oropharynx (-37+/-6% versus -16+/-3%; p<0.01). When the Müller manoeuvre was performed with mandibular advancement, airway collapse was greater in nonresponders than responders in the velopharynx (-80+/-11% versus +9+/-37%; p<0.001), oropharynx (-36+/-6% versus -20+/-5%; p<0.05) and hypopharynx (-64+/-6% versus -42+/-6%; p<0.05). These results indicate that velopharyngeal calibre is modified by MAS treatment and this may be useful for predicting treatment response.

摘要

本研究旨在探讨下颌前移矫治器(MAS)对阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)患者清醒时上气道解剖结构的影响。招募了开始接受 MAS 治疗 OSA 的患者。治疗反应定义为呼吸暂停/低通气指数降低≥50%。在仰卧位进行鼻咽镜检查。在 18 名治疗反应者和 17 名无反应者中进行了鼻咽镜检查。下颌前伸导致软腭口径增大(平均值+/-标准差+40+/-10%),口咽和下咽相对变化较小。与无反应者相比,治疗反应者软腭横截面积随下颌前伸而增加的程度更大(+56+/-16%对+22+/-13%;p<0.05)。与基线横截面积相比,Müller 手法时,无反应者上气道塌陷程度大于反应者,在软腭(-94+/-4%对-69+/-9%;p<0.01)和口咽(-37+/-6%对-16+/-3%;p<0.01)。当进行 MAS 治疗的 Müller 手法时,无反应者上气道塌陷程度大于反应者,在软腭(-80+/-11%对+9+/-37%;p<0.001)、口咽(-36+/-6%对-20+/-5%;p<0.05)和下咽(-64+/-6%对-42+/-6%;p<0.05)。这些结果表明,MAS 治疗可改变软腭口径,这可能有助于预测治疗反应。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验