Department of Veterans Affairs Desert Pacific Mental Illness Research, Education, and Clinical Center, Long Beach, CA 90822, USA.
Psychiatr Serv. 2009 Oct;60(10):1350-6. doi: 10.1176/ps.2009.60.10.1350.
This study examined differences in service needs and treatment utilization, retention, and outcomes between African-American, Hispanic, and white substance abusers in community-based treatment programs.
Data were collected from 2,401 African Americans, 3,222 Hispanics, and 7,980 whites who were admitted to 43 drug treatment programs across California from 2000 to 2001. The Addiction Severity Index (ASI) was administered at intake to assess clients' problem severity in a number of domains (alcohol use, drug use, employment, family and social relationships, legal, medical, and psychological), and treatment retention and arrest data were obtained from administrative records. A subsample was followed up at three months to assess service utilization (N=2,145) and again at nine months to readminister the ASI (N=2,566).
All three groups had similar severity levels of drug and legal problems upon treatment entry. Upon entry to treatment, white clients had the highest severity levels of alcohol, family, and psychiatric problems and African Americans had the highest severity levels of employment problems compared with the other two groups. Treatment retention did not differ between the three groups, but whites received a greater number of alcohol treatment services than did African Americans or Hispanics, and African Americans received a greater number of employment services than did Hispanic and white clients. All three groups showed significant improvement in all outcome domains except for medical outcomes. At the nine-month follow-up, whites had worse outcomes in the alcohol domain compared with the other two groups, and whites had worse outcomes in the legal domain compared with Hispanics. Compared with whites, African Americans were significantly less likely to be charged with driving under the influence in the year after treatment admission.
All three groups improved after treatment, although benefits from treatment can be further enhanced if services underscore different facets of the psychosocial problems of each racial and ethnic group.
本研究考察了社区戒毒项目中,非裔美国人、西班牙裔和白人吸毒者在服务需求、治疗利用、保留和结果方面的差异。
数据来自于 2000 年至 2001 年间,加利福尼亚州 43 个毒品治疗项目中 2401 名非裔美国人、3222 名西班牙裔和 7980 名白人的资料。在入组时使用成瘾严重程度指数(ASI)评估客户在多个领域(酒精使用、药物使用、就业、家庭和社会关系、法律、医疗和心理)的问题严重程度,从行政记录中获得治疗保留和逮捕数据。一个亚样本在三个月时进行随访以评估服务利用(n=2145),并在九个月时再次进行 ASI 复查(n=2566)。
三组在治疗开始时均有相似严重程度的药物和法律问题。在开始治疗时,白人客户的酒精、家庭和精神科问题的严重程度最高,而非裔美国人的就业问题严重程度最高,与其他两组相比。三组的治疗保留率没有差异,但白人接受的酒精治疗服务比非裔美国人或西班牙裔多,而非裔美国人接受的就业服务比西班牙裔和白人多。三组在所有结局领域都有显著改善,除了医疗结局。在九个月随访时,白人在酒精领域的结局比其他两组差,在法律领域的结局比西班牙裔差。与白人相比,在治疗后一年,非裔美国人因醉酒驾驶而被指控的可能性显著降低。
三组在治疗后都有改善,但是如果服务强调每个种族和民族群体的社会心理问题的不同方面,可以进一步提高治疗的效果。